Today, astronomy has no understanding of how globular clusters formed and why they continue to exist at present time, while maintaining their configuration.
Some properties of
globular clusters:
1. The structure of
globular star clusters is stable. Moreover, it is invariable. The stars that
make up the cluster are motionless. They are motionless relative to each other,
and the cluster itself is also static.
2. There is No dust in
globular clusters
3. The distribution of
clusters around galaxies is almost spherical.
Being on the positions
of the official doctrine, it is impossible to comprehend what prevents the
gravitational collapse of these conglomerates, but the official science is
trying to get out of the situation by assigning to the globular clusters giant
size.
For the beginning the
note, that for a better understanding of this section, you must first
familiarize yourself with the theory of the structure of substance from the
standpoint of the Law of Mechanics.
Here we just mention
that the Law of Mechanics proposes that there is a special form of matter – a
monolithic ether.
In contrast to the
usual substance, which is permeable to the gaseous ether, monolithic ether is
impermeable, since inside it there are no gaps or voids through which the
gaseous ether could seep.
Consequently, the
movement of macroscopic bodies consisting of a monolithic ether requires a displacement
of a large volume of gaseous ether. For sufficiently large bodies of monolithic
ether motion relative to the ether is almost impossible.
In other words, the monolithic ether has a mass close to infinity, and its acceleration in the ether requires forces tending to infinity. This almost infinite inertia of the monolithic ether leads to the circumstance that the bodies consisting of the monolith ether cannot move through the gaseous ether and always move with the gaseous ether.
In general, the topic
of monolithic ether requires special consideration. This is a completely new,
yet hypothetical state of matter, the existence of which is predicted by the
Law of Mechanics. As far as I know, the very possibility for substance to be in
a state similar to monolithic and be impervious to ether has not been
previously considered. The properties of such substances must be quite
extraordinary.
Imagine that such a
substance was on the surface of the Earth. It is likely that gravity will push
it down to the planet’s core. To keep the body formed from such a substance on
the surface will be possible only if it is possible to resist the pressure of
the ether moving in the direction of the center of the Earth. The smaller the
transverse dimensions of the body, the less resistance it should have to the
gravitational flow of the ether. What is the total pressure of the ether is not
yet clear; it is also unclear whether the ether can flow around macroscopic
obstacles, if it is not possible to seep through them.
It is possible that
the very core of large celestial bodies with gravity, consist of an ethereal
monolith. Star cores – most likely. The hypothesis of the ethereal monolith
allows us to give unforeseen by simplicity and
obviousness explanations for many puzzles and unsolvable questions observed
both in remote places of the universe and very close. But more about that sometimes
later.
In the meantime, back
to the globular clusters.
Although the existence of the ethereal monolith is questionable, there are indications of the reality of the presence of such a state of matter, and one of them is the globular clusters and their evolution into open clusters. It is possible that there is some other explanation for the properties of globular clusters, also satisfying all the observed facts. But so far only the monolithic state of the ether in combination with the Law of Mechanics able to cope with the explanation of the properties of spherical clusters.
Messier 13 (NGC 6205) Globular clusters have completely inexplicable properties if they are analyzed from the standpoint of orthodox science.
The photo shows a
globular cluster Messier 13 (NGC 6205).
Description of the process of formation and development of globular clusters in accordance with the Law of Mechanics.
Globular clusters were
formed as an outcome of the collapse of large stars due to the pressure drop of
the surrounding ether to a critically low level. The arising pressure wave of
the released ether causes the decay of smaller celestial bodies by the domino
effect.
The process of decay
is somewhat similar to the hypothesis of the disintegration of the planet, the
pieces of which presumably formed a belt of asteroids.
Here again we return
to the idea of how fragile is the balance on which the planets, stars and the
substance as a whole are built. Everything is held by external pressure, and in
case of its weakening, or a sharp change, the structure of the planet or atom
or proton may disintegrate.
For the planet it is
enough to get between two oppositely directed flows/vortices of ether, to
experience the bursting effect of the ether. Planets having the misfortune to
be in these conditions risk being torn to pieces. Apparently the size of the
planet should play a role in determining the fate of such a planet, because the
own gravity of a large planet will keep it intact. In this case, we can have a
planet escaped from the galactic plane and joined the galactic halo.
All of these scenarios
may be related to the fragmentation of superstars as a result of the depletion
of the ether, and the presence of a large number of globular clusters inside
the nebulae may indicate just such a process. Under certain conditions, the
nucleus of the galaxy disintegrates, sending a shock wave in all directions
from itself; this shock wave of the ether can be the cause of the breakdown of
many stars and planets included in this system. As a result, we will have a
nucleus-free galaxy containing a large number of globular clusters in a cloud
of dust, something similar to the Large and Small Magellanic Cloud, and
possibly the Milky Way Galaxy.
The described scenario
allows to explain the observed properties of globular clusters.
Composition: almost
free of heavy elements, almost pure hydrogen and helium. This may be the
result:
1) The initial total
decay of material bodies smaller than a few kilometres, that is, the guaranteed
decay of complex gases and dust. As a result, the globular clusters contain
almost no heavy elements, and only hydrogen and helium remain.
2) Slow evaporation of
the monolithic ether of which the large fragments consist. As a result of this
evaporation, free gaseous ether and protons are formed. The free ether slowly emanating
as a result of evaporation causes a gradual expansion of globular clusters and
thus the evolution of close globular clusters into open clusters.
3) Fragments of the
ethereal monolith pass through the process of grinding the protruding parts,
and turning into balls. This is one of the processes leading to the formation
of spherical shapes in celestial bodies. (Other processes leading to the same
result — the formation of spherical shapes in celestial bodies will be
considered in the relevant sections.)
Now about the
possibility of rotation of fragments of the superstar, which consist of monolithic
ether. It is obvious that the linear motion of large blocks of monolithic ether
relative to the gaseous ether is impossible due to the impermeability of the
monolithic ether. But the rotational motion of a spherical body does not
require crossing the ether (penetration through the ether). Globe of monolithic
ether, displaced the gaseous ether, has the ability to rotate without
experiencing significant decelerating and centrifugal forces.
Decelerating will
depend on the degree of roughness of the surface, and how it differs from the
ideal ball. Perhaps this imperfection in combination with roughness can explain
the red or yellow glow of some objects in globular clusters. These objects have
rotation unlike their white neighbors, which only reflect light.
A very interesting
property of bodies consisting of a monolithic ether should be the absence of
centrifugal forces. As a result, you can have almost unlimited rotational
speed…
Fragments consisting
of a monolithic ether can possibly glow without rotation, simply evaporation of
the monolith into hydrogen and the transformation of deeper layers into some
heavy elements. It is possible that both of these processes are accompanied by
the release of light. That is, there may be another process of illumination of
stars, in addition to gravitational.
Unlike gravity, the
process of evaporation (melting/sublimation) of the monolithic ether has a
limitation on resources; the process can only continue until the monolith is
used up. I.e. internal reserves, limit the process duration, the influence of
the external pressure of the ether is less important. In contrary to Gravity,
which uses external reserves of ether, which are almost unlimited.
The shape of globular
clusters repeats the shape of the ethereal “bubble”, which is formed
when the ether is released during the decay of stars and planets. We can say
that the substance suddenly converts into space (monolithic ether transforms
into gaseous). The emerged space is expanding carrying the fragments of the
monolithic ether. Having expanded up to the pressure of the surrounding ether,
the newly released gaseous ether stops, and with it all the bodies consisting
of the ether-monolith stop.
Further expansion of
the globular cluster is very slow. And since the “stars” of the
monolithic ether do not have gravity, no movement within the globular clusters
does occur, except for the only available method of movement — rotation.
Accordingly, the
distribution of globular clusters is also spherical, since it is subject to the
motion of the ether released from the nuclei of “galaxies”.
The image of the galaxy
NGC 1365 shows the central spindle-shaped vortex, the axis of which lies in the
plane of the galaxy, and two spiral vortices attached to the poles of the central
vortex. Spiral vortices also rest in the plane of the galaxy.
The superstar located inside the cocoon of the central vortex rotates in the transverse direction to the galaxy plane. Superstar is actually acted as a gyroscope with a fixed position of the axis of rotation in space. This ensures the fixation of the position of the galactic bar in space. From this we can conclude that in front of us is a relatively recently formed spiral galaxy, which has fully completed the transition to a spiral structure and has already managed to accumulate a significant amount of gas-dust matter.
NGC1365
Let’s take a closer
look at the process of forming a galaxy from a solar-type star system.
The first figure shows
the growth of the star accompanied by a slowdown in the rotation of the star,
and the growth of the quantity and size of the planets-satellites of the star.
The first figure shows the growth of the star accompanied by a slowdown in the rotation of the star, and the growth of the quantity and size of the planets-satellites of the star.
The second figure shows the state in which the position of the axis of rotation of the star changes under the influence of the incoming ether flows created by the grown satellites. This process starts after the planets satellites reach a certain critical size, and the crowded arrangement of these planets creates a tipping moment.
The third figure shows the resulting state of the system, in which the axis of rotation of the star already lies in the plane of the galaxy, that is, perpendicular to its original position.
At the same time, the
rotation of the star, which now can be called the galactic center or the
nucleus of the galaxy, slows down even more, as the rotational acceleration
from the equator stops completely. There is only rotational acceleration in the
region of the poles, but this acceleration must overcome the deceleration
caused by the lack of synchronous rotation of the ether in other areas of the
surface of the star. As a result, the rotation of the galactic center may stop
altogether, but the surrounding ether will still participate in the vortex
motion caused by the absorption of the ether by the galactic center.
Necessary clarification – the central star of the galaxy itself does not directly absorb the ether, but only participates in the process of condensation of the ether. The ether is condensed by the system (structure) consisting of the central star and the surrounding ether vortex. Therefore, the name galactic center is very appropriate for the central star, as it is only part of a more complex structure.
Two circumstances
explain the steady state of the galaxy’s arms in the galaxy plane.
The first is the
residual action of the GV (Gravitational Vortex), which previously provided retention
of all the satellites of the star in the plane of its ecliptic. This fading
ethereal vortex defined the initial location of the two new ethereal vortices
in its plane.
This influence was of
limited duration and ended with the end of the transition period from
Kepler-type to galactic-type GV.
The inertial action of
the Kepler Vortex also determined the direction of axial rotations of the
galactic sleeves and the direction of their spiral bend.
The second reason why the galactic sleeves are in the same plane is their mutual attraction. The mechanism of such attraction is illustrated by the figure.
Opposite directed
rotation of the ethereal vortices of the galactic sleeves leads to the development
of a reduced ether pressure between the sleeves. Therefore, the sleeves move in
the direction of lower pressure. Thus, the sleeves are attracted to each other
to form a common plane. After analysing the figure with a schematic
representation of the spiral structure, we can see that all the sleeves of the
galactic spiral always border on the opposite rotating sleeves, that is, the
spiral nebula forms a very dense “package”, which tends to
self-compression.
The fading Kepler
Ether vortex drags the sleeves into the plane of the Ecliptic, and twists them
at the same time. This is a transitional and relatively short-term process. As
soon as the Kepler gravity vortex’s reserve of inertia is exhausted, the galaxy
is left to itself. Its form is maintained in the form in which it has managed
to be, and new formative effects are beginning to play a major role.
These effects, as
already mentioned, are mainly determined by two polar etheric vortices
belonging to superstar, which lies on its side and rotates very slowly. The
gas-dust substance produced by a superstar accumulates in the space surrounding
it. This new material forms a kind of atmosphere around the galactic nucleus.
The presence of this atmosphere allows us to see the shape of the ether
vortices generated by the superstar. As in ordinary planetary atmospheres, the
intrinsic pressure of gas-dust matter resists gravity and prevents the fall of
matter on the surface of the Central body. This explains the paradox of the
movement of clouds of gas and dust in the direction from the galactic center,
with the predominant direction of the ether to the absorbing superstar.
In this regard, it is interesting to consider the situation with the galaxy UGC1382, in which the galactic ether vortex is not yet fully visible in the optical range due to the insufficient amount of accumulated gas-dust material.
At left, in optical light, UGC 1382 appears to
be a simple elliptical galaxy. But spiral arms emerged when astronomers
incorporated ultraviolet and deep optical data (middle). Combining that with a
view of low-density hydrogen gas (shown in green at right), scientists
discovered that UGC 1382 is gigantic. Credits: NASA/JPL/Caltech/SDSS/NRAO/L.
Hagen and M. Seibert. Only
photos taken in the ultraviolet spectrum allow us to see the true size of the
ethereal vortex formed by the central star of the galaxy. It can be assumed
that as a superstar produce the new substance; the ethereal vortex will be
filled with gas and dust material further and further, and eventually become
available for observation in the visible range.
It is feasible that
some irregular or pecular galaxies may represent galaxies at different stages
of the transition process from the Kepler-type vortex to the galactic one.
Galaxies with polar rings
Another example in support of our hypothesis about the structure and mechanism of formation of galaxies are so-called galaxies with polar rings. One of these galaxies NGC 4650A is presented in the photo.
For comparison, one of
the drawings illustrating our hypothesis is placed nearby. The picture reversed
to match the direction of twisting of the arms of the galaxy. The similarity
with our scheme is quite obvious. It can be concluded that the galaxy NGC 4650A
is at the stage when the rollover of the superstar has already completed, and
its axis of rotation coincides with the galactic plane. The superstar maintains
a rotation speed sufficient to keep a noticeable equatorial vortex that is
filled with gas-dust matter. Apparently, the revolution of the superstar
occurred at a relatively early stage, due to a large mass of satellite planets,
“successful” combination of orbital positions of which initiated the
rollover of the star. The photo really shows numerous planets and their groups.
Especially large groups of planets are just in places where begin to form the
sleeves of the galaxy. Over time, the central star of the galaxy will slow down
its rotation and its equatorial vortex will shrink and change its shape from
disk to elliptical / spindle-shaped; most of the gas and dust will be
concentrated in the sleeves, which will increase its length and density, and as
a result we will have an ordinary spiral galaxy.
In this regard, the galaxy NGC 660 is of interest, which is just at the stage when the axis of rotation of the Central superstar has not yet fully turned to a position parallel to the galactic axis.
Accordingly, the axis of the Equatorial vortex is in a transitional state from a perpendicular position with respect to the galactic vortex to the position coinciding with the galactic vortex. As in the previous case, there is a large number of satellite planets and they are accumulated at places on the galactic plane from where the beginnings of the sleeves can be traced. And there is a lower density of gas-dust matter in the galactic plane compared to the equatorial plane of the galactic nucleus, indicating a greater age of the Equatorial vortex compared to the galactic vortex. Also visible the ring around the galactic center in two places of which the beginnings of the two opposite sleeves already formed.
The ubiquitous law of conversion
of quantitative changes into qualitative…
The gradual
deceleration of the rotation of a large star leads to a slowdown in the
rotation of the gravitational ether vortex. Before the vortex provided stable
rotation of the star due to the balance of acceleration and deceleration acting
simultaneously to the core of the star (see section on tachocline).
But as the speed of
rotation of the star decreases, the ratio between the speeds of rotation of the
ether in the polar and equatorial regions of the stars changes. The
predominance of the equatorial velocity gradually becomes negligibly small. Now
those velocities are practically equal.
Superstar almost does
not rotate.
The ether in the equatorial
regions moves nearly vertically, with a very small tangential component, which
leads to the appearance of inhibitory forces opposing accelerations. All these
processes can be classified as internal, relating mostly to central star itself.
But there are also
external processes related to the system around the star. Qualitative changes
are also taking place here. While the growth of the central star has stopped,
the growth of the planets within its system continues. Finally, there comes a situation
when the gravitational balance within the star system is shifted towards an
ensemble of planets that have grown to the size of competing with the size of
the central star.
As a result, the star
is capsized; its axis of rotation lies down in the plane of the Ecliptic of the
former star system. This process is quite smooth, as there is a simultaneous
change in the position of the axis of rotation of the star and of the ether
vortex, which provides this rotation. According to the Law of Mechanics, the
star will experience internal stresses only in cases when there are
accelerations of the ether inside it. So the star itself is not deeply affected
by the rotation axis of the rotation by 90 degrees.
But you can imagine
that for the satellites of the star such a restructuring is equal to a
universal catastrophe. In any case, the world around them, to put it mildly,
ceases to be the same. The resulting galactic structure has a very stable
orientation in space, as the central star continues to play the role of a
gyroscope, despite its very slow rotation.
But, if earlier the
gyroscope of the star stabilized the position of the axis of rotation of the
entire star system, and the rotation of the satellites of the star was clearly
visible due to the huge distances they pass through the orbits around the star;
now the gyroscope of the star stabilizes only the axis of rotation of the star
itself, which can look like a galactic bar, connecting points of the origination
of two galactic arms.
Note that spiral galaxies
have only two arms coming from the nucleus. Additional sleeves, if any, are
formed as a result of division from the main sleeves. That is, spiral galaxies
always have two poles to which the sleeves are attached. Due to the described
structure, the movement inside the galaxy is almost undetectable, which
increases the impression of the immensity of galaxies and the distances to
them.
The loss of rotation
of the star is accompanied by the restructuring of the gravitational vortex
(GV). GV from the equatorial flat becomes spindly cross-polar. As a
transitional phase, galaxies of elliptical structure are formed, when planets
and stars (large planets satellites by this time already grown into stars) are
rearrange from Equatorial orbits into polar chains and conglomerates. The
vortex gradually acquires a flattened form, passing through a period of
turbulence.
The ethereal vortex converts
into galactic type, that is, it takes the form of a spiral galaxy. And it
spreads far in the vicinity of the superstar, not just where it can be seen due
to the dust it contains. The vortex again takes a flat form, but this form is
different from the original.
In the past, it was a
form typical to the young star system, such as the Sun. Two ether-vortexes meeting
in the Equatorial plane were sucking the ether out of the spherical volume,
forming an ultra-thin plane of the Ecliptic in which planets and satellites
have been collected.
The replacement galactic
vortex consists of two ether twisters directed to each other by their funnels.
They rotate unidirectionally with the star. But at a much greater angular
velocity than a slow star. Dust accumulation in the form of a galactic bar is
formed by suction of dust and gas into a spindle-shaped vortex located along
the axis of rotation of the star.
Thus stellar evolution
enters its third phase, where the star remodels the form of associated ethereal
vortex.
The Central star,
which became the core of the new “galaxy” (nebula) is no longer
growing. But the structures surrounding the core, the most prominent of which
are the gas-dust sleeves, grow in size.
Planets and stars located
inside gas-dust sleeves continue to grow, but their growth is less noticeable
than the growth of the sleeves, so the sleeves are much larger than the celestial
bodies inside them.
If the stars located
in the sleeves of the nebulae grow to the size of superstars, they, in turn,
can begin to rebuild their gravitational vortices into the polar (galactic)
type. This leads to the budding of the young galaxy from the old one.
There is an abundance
of cosmic images illustrating the described scenario at its various stages of
development; from the rudimentary daughter vortex inside a mature galaxy, and
to the fully formed young galaxy associated with the mother galaxy. There are
also more complex systems consisting of several galaxies.
What’s next? Some
stars that are in the galactic sleeves, experiencing insufficient ether
pressure, due to the intense competition from the surrounding stars, and as a
result break up, forming globular clusters within galaxies.
In the process of breakdown,
dust and gas decay, as these are the most unstable bodies, due to their small
size. Large pieces of superstar more sustainable and evaporate with less
intensity. The result is a clean space, free from dust and gas, and occupied
only by large spherical fragments.
And superstar
(galactic center) is also falling apart. This is confirmed by the existence of
nuclear-free galaxies.
For the star itself,
this (fourth) stage of evolution is the last, after which the star ceases to
exist as a single object.
The scenario of the
fourth stage of stellar evolution (the process of superstar decay) will be
presented after the section devoted to the structure of matter. Since for its
understanding, it is necessary to get acquainted with the concepts of the
structure of atoms from the standpoint of the Law of Mechanics. Therefore, the
decay phase of the galactic nebula core is not yet considered.
Thus, stellar
evolution supplemented by the galactic period in accordance with the Law of
Mechanics consists of three sections:
The first phase includes the period of growth of the planet since the acquisition of gravity, in this part, the growth of the planet is accompanied by an increase in the planet’s own rotation and the temperature of its surface until it reaches luminosity (i.e., transformation into a star).
The second section is the period of growth of the star, since the appearance of luminosity, in this area the growth of the star is accompanied by a slowdown in its own rotation, while maintaining the temperature (and, accordingly, the spectrum).
The third section is accompanied by a decrease in the speed of rotation of the star to a critical one, at which the gravitational vortex changes its structure, and the size of the star reaches the limit at which the star turns into a galactic nucleus. The galactic nucleus no longer grows, but only produces the energy and matter scattered around the galactic center.
The main difference
between the evolutionary sequence of stars according to the Law of Mechanics is
the opposite (in comparison with the Main Sequence) direction of stellar
evolution. So according to orthodox science, stars evolve from yellow to red,
and according to the Law of Mechanics, on the contrary, from red to yellow.
The third section is
not represented in any way in the generally accepted diagrams. Organized
science distinguishes galactic nuclei in a special category of objects, related
to “black holes”.
Typical Structures Of Galaxies
Let’s try to
illustrate what was said on the example of typical nebulae (galaxies),
considering them in the order of the probable evolutionary sequence.
Let us repeat the
basic definitions. Gravity Vortex (GV) can be of two types:
1) Equatorial, Kepler
that is, such that exists around the Sun, the plane of this vortex coincides
with the equatorial plane of the star, which in the case of the solar system
roughly corresponds to the plane of the Ecliptic. While the star is in the
second phase of its evolution, star’s axis of rotation is perpendicular to the
plane of the Ecliptic.
2) Galactic
gravitational vortex, the plane of this vortex also coincides with the plane of
the Ecliptic of the star system. But now it is the former Equatorial plane of
the Central star. This plane is preserved due to the fact that there are
satellite planets, which have a significant mass and inertia. And thanks to the
inertia of the ethereal vortex, which was generated by the star. After the axis
of rotation of the star has turned (relative to the Ecliptic) from perpendicular
to parallel position, its equatorial vortex (equatorial plane) no longer
coincides with the plane of the Ecliptic, but is perpendicular to it.
Ultra Slim Galaxy
For example, images of galaxies NGC4565 and NGC4594 (M104 Sombrero) are provided.
NGC4565NGC4594 (M104 Sombrero)
Apparently, these
galaxies are superstars that have reached the size at which they produce an
increased amount of dust and gas, but have not yet slowed to a critical speed
and therefore retained around them the usual gravitational vortex of Kepler
type.
It is possible that
such nebulae are formed mainly from stars that do not have large satellites,
which would contribute to the overturning of the Equatorial gravitational
vortex (GV) and its transformation into a spiral with two sleeves.
Elliptical galaxy
Some elliptical galaxies may represent the same hyper thin galaxies, but they are visible from a different angle, allowing us to study them in more detail. For example the galaxy ESO 325-G004, shown in the photo.
ESO 325-G004
As well as hyper thin
galaxies, elliptical galaxies are characterized by a small amount of gas and
dust, which is quite logical for superstars only entering this period and have
not yet developed a noticeable amount of gas and dust. Note the other galaxies
and stars that are clearly visible in this picture, behind the galaxy ESO
325-G004 and shining through its structure. It is very curious that this galaxy
is attributed to its gigantic size (more than 100,000 light years across) and
being at a monstrous distance from us (about 450 million light years), although
it is obvious that the stars shining through the gas-dust cloud can not be
located far away, which allows us to judge the size of the nucleus of this
galaxy, comparing it with neighboring stars in the background.
Speaking about the
size of the nucleus, it should be mentioned that the visible dimensions of the
nucleus seem larger due to the luminous halo arising from the scattering of
light on the gas-dust substance.
Galaxies grow due to
increase of gas-dust sleeves and growth of the celestial bodies entering their
structure. These growing celestial bodies – planets and stars, also contribute
to the gas-dust cloud of galaxies, releasing part of the substance formed as a
result of the absorption of ether.
Returning to the subject
of the stars in the background. According to organized science, these stars
experience a truly miraculous transformation because they are actually globular
clusters. Organized science gives stars an admirable ability to sense the
boundary between the state of a star and the state of a globular cluster.
Moreover, this boundary is determined in relation to the Earth.
Here is a quote from the description of the picture: “Hubble resolves thousands of globular star clusters orbiting ESO 325-G004. Globular clusters are compact groups of hundreds of thousands of stars that are gravitationally bound together. At the galaxy’s distance they appear as pinpoints of light contained within the diffuse halo.”
There is doubt looming
about all the other stars around us: how can we be sure that all the other
stars are not really globular clusters?
Another type of elliptical galaxy is the dwarf galaxy, which is likely is a type of globular cluster, which will be discussed in the section on star decay. Note that globular clusters consist mainly of stars and contain almost no interstellar gas-dust matter. That is, according to our classification, globular clusters are young formations, or rather newly born formations that began a second life. Although probably more correct to say a new life, as it is unknown how many cycles of growth and decay survived their substance so far.
The following photo demonstrates another elliptical galaxy SDSS J162702.56+432833.9
J162702.56 + 432833.9
Here we are mainly
interested in the absence of large amounts of gas and dust. Another interesting
feature of this galaxy is the apparent chaotic shape, despite its close to
elliptical overall shape. It is possible that we have before us a fairly early
stage in the process of transformation of an ethereal gravitational vortex of
the Kepler type to a gravitational vortex of the galactic type. The later stage
of this transition is described in the next section on spiral galaxies. Once
again, we emphasize that the determining factor in galactic evolution is the
amount of gas-dust matter, the more dust, the older the galaxy. And the age of
the galaxy should correspond to its size, all other things being equal.
So we found
that parallax cannot be used to determine distances to stars. At least it cannot
be used now, until there is no understanding of how space is distorted under
the influence of Gravitational Vortex Parallax (GVP).
But the
situation is not hopeless. There are at least two very reasonable ways to
determine distances to stars. Both methods are based on the application of the
ideas of the Law of Mechanics in relation to the evolution of stars, namely —
the correlation between the size of stars and the speed of their rotation.
The first method allows determining distances to stars for which angular sizes and rotation periods are known. Rotation periods make it easy to determine the true size of stars, since the rotation period of a large star is uniquely correlated to its diameter.
Delta
Cepheids allow us to use this method most simply, since the period of variation
in the brightness of these Cepheids is equal to the period of their rotation.
Therefore, Cepheids with known angular dimensions are ideal objects for this
method. Delta Cepheids were discussed in more detail in one of the previous
sections of these transcripts.
Recently,
there emerge techniques to measure the periods and speeds of rotation for other
stars, not only Cepheids. So this method and the next method can also be used
to estimate the distances to such stars.
To
calculate the distances, we will use the data of measurements of angular
dimensions of ten Cepheids. Data are taken from the articles:
1) P. Kervella et al. “Cepheid distances from infrared long-baseline interferometry»
2) T. E. Nordgren et al. “Astrophysical Quantities of Cepheid Variables Measured with the NPOI»
3) P. Kervella et al. “Observational calibration of the projection factor of Cepheids III. The long-period Galactic Cepheid RS Puppis»
First,
let’s define the diameters of the Cepheids according to their periods. As a
unit of measurement we will use the diameter of the Earth. Vega has been added
to the list of stars, as it is (was) the standard of zero visible magnitude and
will be needed in the future to calculate distances by the second method, which
is based on the visible brightness of stars.
For Vega
and Earth, the logarithm of the period and the area of the visible surface (the
area of the circle with a diameter equal to the star) are not shown in the
table. This is done because the linear dependence of luminosity on the
logarithm of the period does not apply to them. The Earth (fortunately) is not
yet glowing and stays on the initial branch of stellar evolution, where
celestial bodies are smaller than the critical size of 20 earth diameters. And
Vega situated right in the region of the minimum of the stellar evolutionary
chart. In this area there is a transition from increasing the speed of rotation
to slowing down the rotation as the stars grow. Specifically, for
“small” stars (less than 20 Earth diameters) the period of rotation
decreases, and for larger stars (including Cepheids), the period of rotation
increases with increasing diameter. The causes of this phenomenon were
considered in the first part of the article devoted to stellar evolution.
The graph of the initial section of stellar evolution is given for illustration below.
The position of the Earth and Vega is shown by arrows, also for comparison the positions of Jupiter and three other giant planets are shown. Other celestial bodies larger than Vega, shown simply to illustrate the pattern of growth of the period of rotation with the growth of stars.
Graphs are plotted
according to the table.
The left graph illustrates the increase in the rotational period of Cepheids as their diameter increases. This diagram is a continuation of the previous graph of the initial phase of stellar evolution, but for larger stars. Therefore, in this chart, we see only an increase in the period of rotation as the star grows. By the way, note that the parameters of the Sun, which has a diameter equal to 109 Earth diameters and a rotation period of about 27 days, perfectly coincide with this chart.
The right graph confirms the linear dependence of the luminosity of Cepheids on the logarithm of their period. It is assumed that the luminosity of stars is proportional to the area of the circle with a diameter equal to the diameter of the star (the area of the projection of the surface of the star). That is, the temperature and luminosity of equal areas of any stars are equal to each other, as it follows from the concepts about the nature of stars from the standpoint of the Law of Mechanics. Thus, the Law of Mechanics allows to explain the reasons for the linear dependence of the luminosity of Cepheids on the logarithm of their period. A more detailed analysis of this interesting topic will require special consideration and will be provided later.
Next, we use the obtained values of the diameters of the stars and the angular diameters taken from the previously mentioned articles to calculate the distances to the stars. The distance is:
where D is the Distance to the star, d is the diameter of the star,
– sine of the angular size of a star.
Since the distance to the stars according to this formula is obtained in the Earth’s diameters, then multiplying these values by 0.00000000134683 we obtain light years.
These calculations are presented in the table, which is the expansion of the previous table, supplemented by columns with angular dimensions and distances to the stars. The stars in the table are arranged in ascending order of the periods of rotation and, accordingly, the size of the stars.
The following table summarizes for comparison of the distances we have obtained and the generally accepted distances to the same stars assumed by organized science. As can be seen, in the case of the Cepheids, the official science is mistaken in the evaluation of the distances from 68 to 170 times.
The second method of determining distances to stars is based on the dependence of brightness on the period of rotation of stars. For the application of this method it is also the most convenient to use Cepheids. To determine the distance to Cepheids we need to use their maximum brightness.
The accuracy of this
method suffers from uncertainty with the degree of transparency of the space
between the Earth and the observed star. The light coming from each star is not
equally attenuated. The attenuation of light corresponds to the degree of dust
and gas contamination of space, mainly near the observed star. Therefore,
applying this method we should expect:
a) for each individual
stars, the overestimation in the distances compared with the first method
b) overestimation of
distances in comparison with the first method due to the unavoidable absorption
of light by the interstellar medium in proportion to the distance.
However, this method
can be used to verify the accuracy of the results obtained by the angular
dimension method, which we will do.
Both of our methods
should give comparable results and that will be a confirmation of their
correctness, since these are completely independent methods.
The main prerequisites
on which this method is based follow from the Law of Mechanics:
1) the surface
Temperature of all stars is approximately the same after reaching the
luminosity state and resembles the surface temperature of the Sun
2) the Diameter of the
stars is uniquely determined by their period of rotation, under two conditions:
a) these are single stars that do not experience inhibitory tidal action from a
large satellite, and b) the size of these stars exceeds 27 Earth diameters.
We will calculate the
brightness of the stars using the distances already found. Thus, we will check
whether the calculations made by us make sense.
Brightness is the ratio between the distance to stars and their luminosity, based on the fact that the brightness is inversely proportional to the square of the distance.
where Iv is the brightness of Vega, Is the brightness of the star, Dv and Ds distance to Vega and to the star. Then the brightness of the star is:
The obtained brightness values are converted into magnitude and compared with the reference value. Make the necessary corrections on the transparency of space.
Here it is necessary
to return to the question of the position of Vega, which was the standard of
zero visible magnitude, on the evolutionary chart.
The diameter and the
corresponding position of Vega on the evolutionary curve is approximate, it
will be possible to clarify it after a detailed analysis of the mechanism of
rotation of stars, and the evolution of this rotation, while at this time only
an estimated analysis can be carried out. For the initial estimation of stellar
distances it is enough to determine the position of Vega on the evolutionary
curve based on its period of rotation and the approximate dependence of the
period — diameter composed simply from reasons of symmetry and proportionality,
which we do.
The error that is
possible as a result of such a rough estimate is much smaller than the errors
of orthodox astronomers. This is due to the fact that Vega’s parameters are not
used in the first method of determining the star distances, but have been used only
to verify the agreement of the results with the law of propagation of light.
Variations in the
assessment of the diameter of Vega are altering the shift in the values of
transparency of space. Acceptable transparency values are obtained by varying
the diameter of Vega in the range of 15 to 25 Earth diameters. At the same
time, if the diameter of Vega is chosen as 15 terrestrial, then the
transparency of space is too large (reaching 97% for δ Cep), and if the
diameter is selected as 25 Earth diameters, then the transparency coefficients
are too small (10.3% for Y Oph). Therefore, a diameter equal to 20 earth
diameters was chosen as a compromise.
Of special interest is
the distribution of the degree of transparency of space depending on the
distance to the stars, which were obtained from our calculations. For
comparison, a graph of the decrease in light intensity when passing through a
substance is placed side by side. The light intensity due to absorption in the
substance, decreases exponentially depending on the distance travelled, in
accordance with the law of absorption of light. In order to determine whether
or not the light coming from the stars obeys the law of absorption, a
statistically significant amount of data will be needed.
In the meantime, we can only theorize about individual stars and their immediate environment. Take for example the Cepheid Y Oph, it stands out from the general picture because of its low brightness. Despite the fact that this star is the second farthermost from us among all considered stars, its brightness is still too small to match to the exponent of the law of absorption of light. The reason for this may be the near-stellar gas envelope (circumstellar envelop) surrounding the star according to observations.
And for comparison, we present another graph, based on data on star distances according to the estimates of organized science for the same stars.
The data for this
chart are taken from the table below, which is compiled from formulas
previously used, but using orthodox valuations of the diameters of the stars.
The table summarizes all relevant data, which in previous calculations
(according to the Law of Mechanics) were presented in individual tables.
Short comment to the obtained
results:
1) Estimation of
distances by apparent brightness and diameters gives a chaotic spread of coefficients
of the transparency of space. As you can see in the diagram above: coefficient
of transparency depending to star distance.
2) Only for one occasion
(Y Oph) do these corrections make physical sense, having a value less than
100%. In all other cases, the space transparency coefficients vary from 153% to
395%, which makes no physical sense, since it implicates increase in the light level
as it passes from the star to the observer.
3) The situation is even more confusing due to the fact that for the Sun we need to use an incredibly small value of the transparency of space (5.9%), which is completely absurd.
The introduction of
corrections for the amplification / attenuation of light by space deprives the
physical sense from official estimates of distances to all stars considered
here without exception.
Organized science disregards
these contradictions by manipulating the individual specific luminosity of the
surfaces of different stars, that is, their temperature / spectrum. By doing
that, you can get any desired result.
But to talk about the different luminosity of the stars considered here is not possible, since they are all Delta Cepheids, that is, belong to the stars of the same class; that by the way is the basis of the famous relation mass – luminosity.
We continue
the discussion of the evolution of planets/stars. Lets analyze the nature of
Cepheids
Cepheids
are of great importance for understanding the nature of stars, their evolution
and distances to stars.
Cepheids represent a clear confirmation of the correctness of the Law of Mechanics in the explanation of the mechanism of growth of stars, the mechanism of rotation of stars and the internal structure of stars. There is a deliberate emphasis on mechanics, since it is Mechanics that determines the main processes of functioning of stars – their heating, rotation and growth. Ultimately, all the additional effects that are now associated with electrical, magnetic, radiation and optical phenomena are also can be reduced to mechanical, but more on that later.
Here is
what is known about Cepheids: the Graph of Cepheid brightness change (see
figure) is an asymmetric periodic curve: a fast rise is followed by a slow
decline. The highest temperature is observed during maximum brightness, and the
radial velocity change curve is a mirror reflection of the brightness curve:
during maximum brightness, the surface of the star moves away from us at
maximum speed.
The longer the period of Cepheid, the higher its luminosity. The dependence of period – luminosity was discovered quite a long time ago, but still not received a satisfactory explanation. As has not received an acceptable explanation the asymmetric shape of the curves of the luminosity and radial velocity. The change in luminosity in opposite phase with radial velocity also needs a reasonable explanation.
Our
explanation of the nature of Cepheids logically follows from our understanding
of the process of conversion the planet into a star.
As it
grows, glowing areas appear on the surface of the planet, such as Jupiter,
which has two Red Spots. At the same time, as it grows, the rotation of a large
planet-star slows down. Analysis of the causes of this slowdown is given in the
section “Evolution of the period of rotation of planets and stars”.
The spotted
star rotates, and so we see a periodic increase in brightness when the luminous
surface is turned in our direction, and a decrease in brightness when we see the
surface of the star through the clouds.
Simultaneously
with the growth of the cepheids must occur reduction of the difference between
the high and the weak luminosity phases; since the luminous regions are
increasing their share of the surface, and respectively areas covered with
clouds are getting smaller.
Also, as
the stars grow, the total luminosity of stars increases, due to the increase in
the radiating area of the star.
Thus, there
is no cyclic inflation-contraction of the Cepheids, but a trivial rotation of
stars having on its surface a spot over which constant outgassing process. A
cloud layer does always exist above these spots.
Necessary
clarification: gas-emitting spots of Cepheids are not analogues of sunspots.
Without going into details, the nature of sunspots is completely different.
Unlike the Sun, Cepheid spots are almost invariable formations with a constant
position on the surface of the stars. Scenarios of origin of such formations
will be discussed in another article, and now we are only interested in the circumstance
that these formations are constantly generating dense clouds that block the
radiation of Cepheids.
Cepheids
are comparable in size to the Sun (stars with a smaller rotation period than
the Sun have a smaller size than the Sun, and stars with a larger period than
the Sun have a correspondingly larger size than the Sun), and the
super-luminosity and gigantism attributed to Cepheids is the result of a
trivial error caused by an incorrect estimation of astronomical distances (see
section on aberration and parallax).
In the case of Cepheids, nature has again prepared a trap for straight-line thinking. Changes in the radial velocity science rushed to explain by the periodic changes in the size of the Cepheids. In fact, everything is much simpler: instead of radial pulsations, we are dealing with the rotation of “spotted” stars.
First, we will investigate the reason why the front of the increase in the luminosity of the Cepheid is steeper than the trailing edge. This occurs as a result of the superrotation effect, according to which the atmosphere of planets and stars always rotates faster than the surface of the planet or star. We encounter this effect when flying a plane from West to East takes less time than flying from East to West. That is, in the atmospheres of planets and stars winds blowing in the direction of rotation are always dominating.
For illustration of the implications of this effect, see the figure below.
The figure
shows two variants of the planet’s rotation relative to an outside observer. In
this case, only two options for the formation and location of clouds on the
planet are possible. Impossible options are crossed out by red crosses. That
is, the clouds always stretch forward and thinning in the direction of rotation
of the planet, the back front of the clouds always has a shortened size,
compared with the stretched front.
It does not matter from which side the observer looks at the rotating planet (only if it is not a view from the pole). Any, except the axial position of the observer, will allow to detect the change in the luminosity of the star.
The radial velocity of the surface of a star (but not the surface of clouds!) will have a zero value (minus the star’s own speed).
When a luminescent
spot on a rotating Cepheid appears in our field of vision, the radiating
surface is always recede from us, as there is a transition from the height of
the clouds to the surface of the star (regardless of the position of the axis
of rotation and the direction of rotation). Therefore, the increase in the
luminosity of the star caused by the turning of the luminous spot to the
observer is always accompanied by a decrease in the radial velocity in the
direction of the observer (the radial velocity is negative).
When the luminous spot reaches a position close to the perpendicular in the direction of the observer, the luminosity of the star is at maximum, and the component of the velocity of the spot in the direction of the observer is zero. Therefore, at the maximum brightness, the radial velocity is at the minimum (the component of the radial velocity of the Cepheid associated with its own axial rotation is zero at this moment).
Figure
showing the independence of the radial velocity curve from the direction of
rotation of the Cepheid
And
finally, when the luminous spot on the rotating Cepheid departs our field of
vision, it is overlapped by clouds, which is equivalent to the approach to us
of their radiating surface, regardless of the position of the axis of rotation
and the direction of rotation. Therefore, with a decrease in the luminosity of
the star, due to the inflow of clouds, the radial velocity of light is always
directed to us (positive).
Once again,
only the application of the Law of Mechanics allows us to understand the cause
of asymmetry of Cepheid curves. As well as all other phenomena observed on the
curves of brightness and radial velocities varying with the Cepheid period.
The spectra of the Cepheids are the spectra of absorption both in the maximum and the minimum. That is, the displacement of their spectral lines is associated with changes in the density/thickness of the upper absorbing layers. This indicates the presence of a continuous cloud layer on the Cepheids without breaks, but of variable thickness.
The effect
of the appearance of an additional bump on the luminosity graph is explained by
the decrease in the relative area of the cloud spot as the Cepheids grow (the
larger the Cepheid, the smaller the area occupied by the spots, relative to the
total area)
The area of the darker spot (cloud) is smaller than the total area of the luminous surface of the star near the end of the cloud, as the star has increased in size and the spot remains the same.
The
thickness and area of the cloud decreases as the star grows.
Here we
will stop with the consideration of Cepheids, we will return to them when we will
calculate the distance to the stars, as Cepheids allow to do it as simply as
possible, though not as it is done in the scientific industry.
The
erroneous concept of parallaxes has led to the situation that the distance to
the celestial bodies surrounding solar system is determined incorrectly by science,
the real distances to the stars are tens and hundreds of times smaller.
But this is
only the tip of the iceberg; the problems in astronomy are much more serious,
as incorrectly defined distances have led to incorrectly defined dimensions and
properties of celestial bodies. Thus, as a result of supergiant distances there
were emerged such monsters as giant and supergiant stars, monstrous radiation, and,
as it should be in fairy tales, there were also dwarfs and dark forces.
We will explore
this tangle of prejudices, and see how from the point of view of the Law of
Mechanics we can explain what is observed in telescopes.
We will
have to periodically go back in our explanations to redefine the definition of
certain phenomena and objects in the light of the new understanding gained as
we progress in the study of the mechanics and structure of galaxies. This
step-by-step process of gradual revision of concepts is necessary, since
understanding the description of galaxies from the standpoint of the Law of
Mechanics requires a radical rethinking of the very foundations of the physical
worldview.
At some
point we will have to make a small digression and consider in more detail the
mechanism of formation and development of various star associations.
The
revision of concepts will even include the definition of galaxies.
Changing
the scale of distances and sizes of celestial objects will affect the secondary
aberration effects, leading to variations in the “constant” aberration for
different stars, which is another confirmation of the correctness of our
description of the mechanics of galaxies and the phenomenon of aberration.
Back to the discussion of the evolution of planets and stars. We have already touched on this topic when we considered the General principles of the structure of celestial bodies with gravity. Now let’s analyze stellar evolution in more detail, including the nature of cepheids and the so-called stellar sequence.
The evolution of stars, if we consider it as a whole, is a closed-loop cyclic process. You can call this process the cycle of matter-substance in nature.
The very idea of such a cycle is completely alien to organized science, because of that doubts and denial are completely natural and, most likely, inevitable. Therefore, the presentation of the topic will require repetition. First, the basic principles of the cycle will be presented, then the individual stages of the closed-loop cycle will be considered, and then the whole process with conclusions will be re-examined.
The cycle of matter-substance consists of two main stages:
1) formation of substance from ether
2) the disintegration of substance into ether.
Speaking of stellar evolution, we will consider only the first phase of this cycle (the formation of substance from the ether). Although the second stage of the matter-matter cycle is also associated with the stars, this is the disintegration of the stars, whereas evolution implies development rather than mere change.
Further, the first phase of the ether-substance cycle is considered, which in turn itself consists of three sections (periods).
Analysis of the evolution of stars on the basis of the Law of Mechanics allows us to distinguish three main periods in the history of any star. Each of these periods has its own characteristics, but during any period simple laws, mainly mechanical, cause the processes occurring with the stars.
The evolution of a star is characterized by a gradual increase in its size, up to the maximum possible, upon reaching which the growth of the star stops.
As the star grows, so does its temperature, until it reaches a maximum. This maximum is approximately 6000°C — the maximum temperature a substance can have in a liquid state, which is close to the temperature of the sun’s surface. More details about the reasons for this conclusion will be discussed in the section devoted to the nature of heat from the point of view of the Law of Mechanics.
Also, as the star grows, the speed of its axial rotation changes. In the first phase of evolution, the angular velocity of the stars grows and reaches a maximum. In the second section, the speed decreases again until it reaches a minimum. The third section is characterized by an almost constant minimum speed of rotation of the star.
The first phase of star evolution The first phase of the planet’s stellar evolution begins with the acquisition of gravity. At this stage, the growth of the planet is accompanied by an increase in the speed of the planet’s own rotation and an increase in the temperature of its surface until it reaches luminosity (i.e., until the planet turns into a star).
Let’s remind that there is a gravitational layer inside the planet, in this layer the process of condensation of ether into matter is carried out. In this layer, the energy constantly released as a result of the ether-substance phase transition. The substance in this layer is melted and has a temperature comparable to the temperature of the solar surface. A new substance formed in the gravitational layer, partially remains inside of the planet, and partially escapes into the atmosphere of the planet.
The closer the red-hot layer is to the surface, the more of the new substance (mainly hydrogen) enters the atmosphere, and the more powerful the planet’s atmosphere becomes.
But the size of a planet or star does not always uniquely determine the period of its rotation, since the speed of rotation is determined by two factors: the rate of incidence of the ether and the geometry of the inner layers of the planet. A certain combination of these two variables corresponds to the maximum angular velocity of rotation that a normal planet can have.
The maximum angular velocity corresponds to the minimum rotation period: about 0.4 earth days (9.5 hours). Jupiter is very close in its period to this minimum.
After reaching the maximum speed of rotation, further growth of planets/stars is accompanied by a decrease in their speed of rotation. Therefore, the same periods of rotation can have a planet like the Earth, and the stars with the size about 45 times larger diameter.
Along with the maximum angular velocity, there is a maximum linear equatorial velocity that a star can have (since the linear equatorial velocity is equal to the product of the angular velocity by the radius). In contrast to the maximum angular velocity (which belongs to planets with a diameter of about 20 earth’s diameters), the maximum linear equatorial velocity typical to stars with a diameter of about 35 diameters of the Earth. That is, the same with the Earth tangential Equatorial speed, will have a star having 250 times larger diameter (about two and a half diameter of the Sun).
The figures and graphs given below should help to overcome the possible confusion arising from the initial perception of this information.
The reasons for the formation of extremums of angular and tangential velocities are discussed below.
The second phase of the evolution of stars The second phase is the period of growth of the star indeed, that is, starting from the moment of surfacing of the luminosity. In this stage, the growth of the star is accompanied by a slowdown in its axial rotation, and stabilization of the surface temperature.
The second part of stellar evolution is represented in empirical diagrams of stellar sequences. But there is no understanding that these diagrams reflect several different evolutionary paths followed by stars of different composition of origin (more on this in the section on the types of superstar fragments). All these different paths eventually lead to one point – a big yellow star like the Sun.
During the second phase of evolution, the rate of growth of stars gradually slows down, and at the very end of the second phase of evolution, the growth of stars almost stops. That is, the size of the star reaches the maximum limit at which the star turns into a galactic nucleus.
A star that has grown to the stage of the galactic nucleus is no longer growing, but continues to absorb ether, releasing as a product of this action energy and matter, which dissipate in the vicinity of the galactic center.
The third phase of star evolution A star that has reached the maximum possible size continues to be a source of gravity, that is, it absorbs ether, turning it into substance. But this substance is no longer accumulated inside the star, and completely thrown out, forming around the star gas-dust clouds. Stellar systems with noticeable accumulations of gas-dust material are called galaxies.
Staying within the accepted for now astronomical concepts, we can say that with the arriving the star to the third stage of its evolution, a new “galaxy” is formed, and our star becomes its nucleus. More details about this and other metamorphoses occurring with stars that have reached the maximum size and their systems will be discussed later in the section devoted to the formation of “galaxies”.
Now greater detail on the actual mechanics of rotation:
Mechanism of evolution of the period of rotation of planets and stars Let’s explore the evolution of the speed and period of rotation of planets and stars from the point of view of the Law of Mechanics.
Changing the speed of rotation of stars is inseparably linked with the evolution of stars. There are two parts of the evolution of the velocity of celestial bodies.
The first section (planetary) is characterized by an increase in the speed of rotation of the planet.
The second section (stellar) is characterized by slowing down the rotation of the star.
A simple rule can be formulated: periods of rotation from 30 to 6 hours can belong to both stars and planets; and periods of rotation longer than 30 hours are characteristic only of stars. It is necessary to specify that we are not talking about tidal locked celestial bodies, which own rotation is synchronized with their orbital rotation around the Central body.
The graphs
represent planets ‘ rotational periods (in days) depending on the size of the
planet (in earth diameters).
In the
solar system, there are no celestial bodies of intermediate size between
Jupiter and the Sun, so abstract celestial bodies are used for the graph, the
parameters of which allow building a smooth curve. Later the principle of
calculation of parameters of these celestial bodies will be validated and it
will be specified what real stars can serve as their equivalents.
The left
graph shows an enlarged initial (planetary) region. It contains data from the
planets of the solar system (the first six points), and some planets the size
of 20, 30, 40 and 50 earth diameters.
The right
graph allows you to better see the second (star) region. It is supplemented by
a star with the size of 70 earth diameters and the Sun (109 earth diameters).
Accelerating the rotation of the planet as it grows
The
mechanism for changing the speed of rotation of stars is very simple. Remember
that the force applied to the body from the ether is determined by the
acceleration of the ether through this body, and that the speed of the free
body will be equal to the speed of the surrounding ether.
As the
planet grows, the acceleration of the ether through its surface increases, correspondingly
increases the speed of the ether, which spins the planet. The planetary part of
the evolution of stars is characterized by an increase in the speed of ether
absorbed by the planet. The speed of falling ether near the equator defines the
equatorial linear speed of rotation of the planet.
The speed
of the ether reaches its maximum at the end of the planetary stage. After that,
during the next stages of stellar evolution, the speed of the ether will
increase extremely slowly. We can say that the speed of falling of the ether will
not change after reaching its limit, and the further growth of the star will
occur at a virtually constant speed of the falling ether.
But in the
planetary phase of evolution, the increase in the speed of ether outpaces the
increase in the diameter of the planet. The increase in the diameter of the
planet is accompanied by a thinning of the relative size of the outer layer. As
a result — the angular velocity of the planet’s rotation increases, i.e. the
period of rotation decreases.
Let’s
repeat, the increase in the speed of the ether continues until the planet reaches
the state of the protostar (luminosity), while the speed of the ether on the
surface reaches a maximum. The speed of the ether on the surface of the star
remains at this maximum level almost unchanged while the star continues to
grow, for the entire subsequent period of star’s existence.
It is
possible to estimate approximately the minimum period of rotation of
proto-stars — it should be within a few hours, i.e. a little less than Jupiter,
then should follow a flat area of stabilization due to mutual compensation of
existing influences, and then increase of the rotational period. The minimum
period of rotation may correspond to stars with the size of 20 diameters of the
Earth (about twice the size of Jupiter).
Slowing the rotation of a star as it grows
At a constant surface velocity (linear velocity), the radius of the star continues to grow; this leads to a decrease in the angular velocity, i.e. an increase in the period of its rotation.
Now on a
deeper (also literally) the reasons for the change in the velocity of rotation
of celestial bodies. The reason is related to the depth at which occurred the
condensation of the gaseous ether to the solid-state ether. As you can see on
the chart for solar tachocline, the depth where all the ether is fully
compressed into the substance approximately equal to one third the radius of
the Sun. It can be assumed that this depth is determined by the value of the
ether pressure under the action of the ether sink (drain) formed by the Sun.
This pressure is applied to the column of ether located in the pores of solar
material located between the surface of the Sun and the core (depth of
tachocline).
In the
conditions existed on the Sun, the all ether coming from the outer space is
compressed into the solid phase. And in the Earth conditions the complete
transformation of all ether located between the surface and the transforming
layer also occur. The difference is in quantity of the ether falling per unit
of surface at a given time (that is the speed of the falling ether). Depth of the solar tachocline is about 18 Earth
diameters. The depth of the gravitational layer of the Earth is enough to
transform the smaller amount of ether falling per unit of its surface,
comparing to the Sun. We can say that the productivity of gravitational
processes of celestial bodies depends on their size.
This
efficiency depends on the diameter of the celestial body in a dual way. We have
already considered the first mechanism, and the second mechanism is less
pronounced, but it works in the same direction. The larger the body, the
greater the pressure of the ether it creates on its surface as a result of the
absorption of ether from a larger volume. Thus, on the surface of celestial
bodies as their size increases, the pressure of the ether increases. And this,
in turn, accelerates the process of condensation of the ether, from which the
depth required for the complete transformation of the ether into a substance
(that is, the depth of tachocline) decreases.
These processes slow down the speed of rotation of stars as they grow. Two factors work in the same direction: the radius of the star is growing, and even if the tachocline did not change its depth, the increase in the radius of the star would already be enough to slow down the speed of rotation. But since the depth of tachocline does not remain the same but decreases, the core of the star is swelling at a faster rate than the increase in diameter of the star. It is to the core of the star the flow of ether is applied, which spins the star. The speed of these flows changes very slowly as the star grows, but the lever of arm of the force lengthens much faster, and this leads to a slowdown in rotation. (See figures)
The rate of
absorption of ether by a unit of the surface of a star or planet is determined
by the transforming ability of substance. The transformative ability of substance
is a constant for the conditions prevailing in space at the level of the solar
surface.
More detailed: ether falling into the depth of substance creates a gravitational flow, and then this ether is compressed inside the interatomic gaps. At the same time there is a counter flow of matter (protons), rushing outwards under the pressure of newly formed atoms.
Thus, the
larger the star, the more efficiently it converts the ether into substance, and
the closer to the surface of the star is its core. Accordingly, it is less
likely that the newly formed substance will remain inside the body of the star.
This explains the intense dust and gas emission of galactic nuclei.
Evolutionary stellar sequence
Therefore all stellar roads lead to the same place, and these roads have one-way traffic, there is no way back on these roads. The way back is a different process – partly through a catastrophic collapse (the cards are shuffled, and the game begins anew).
The picture
above represents the Hertzsprung—Russell diagram with superimposed arrows
showing the evolution of stars from the point of view of the Law of Mechanics.
The direction of evolution of blue stars (from blue to red) is shown by the
blue arrow, and accordingly the direction of evolution of red stars (from red
to yellow) is shown by the red arrow.
From the point of view of the Law of Mechanics, the place of a star on the evolutionary ladder is uniquely determined by any of its two parameters — the size or the period of rotation. One parameter is inextricably linked to another, and cannot be changed independently of it. That is, the size of the star corresponds to a certain period of rotation of the star around its own axis.
According to Orthodox science, yellow stars evolve into red stars, but according to the Law of Mechanics, red stars evolve into yellow stars and blue stars also evolve into yellow stars.
Therefore, it makes no sense to single out any special “main” sequence, since according to the Law of Mechanics there is only one single evolutionary stellar sequence. According to this sequence, the planet grows into a star, and then into a superstar (galactic nucleus). For each individual planet or star, it is only a matter of time before it grows to a superstar before the matter disintegrates, becoming unstable due to a drop in surrounding ether pressure as it is absorbed by a multitude of neighboring growing stars.
We can say that the Law of Mechanics also has its horror stories, by analogy with the popular science. The role of black holes here play planets and the stars, which absorb not the substance but the ether, and instead of the Big Bang we have the cyclic explosions/disintegrations involving a limited portion of the universe which is “ripe” for such an event.
A small departure relating to the graphs under consideration. To illustrate how the atmosphere affects the detection of the period of rotation of the planet.
At higher
magnification is shown the planetary plot of the dependence of the period of
rotation from the diameter of the planet. The third and fourth points belong
respectively to Neptune and Uranus, for which due to the presence of dense
atmospheres, it is difficult to determine the true values of the diameter and
rotation period. Most likely, the magnitude of the diameter and speed of
rotation of Neptune and Uranus is not properly defined to date, and therefore,
in our graph there is a jump. According to the Law of Mechanics, the so-called
“gas giants” are large stone planets surrounded by powerful atmospheres. It can
be assumed that after determining the true size of the stone parts of the
planets and their periods of rotation, they will form a smooth curve on our
chart.
The topic
of stellar aberration needs to be considered due to the fact that neither
classical nor relativistic physics could provide a satisfactory explanation for
the observed facts.
Without
understanding the causes of stellar aberration it is impossible to understand
why the real stellar parallax is so strikingly different from its geometric
abstraction. And as a result, stellar parallax cannot be used directly to
measure distances to stars.
The failure
of science to explain stellar aberration led to a chain reaction of
misconceptions that played a crucial role in creating the dominant false
picture of the universe today. According to this picture of the world, the
distances to the nearest stars are several light years, which deduced from the
uncritical use of measured parallaxes.
But if we analyze
the stellar aberration from the standpoint of the Law of Mechanics and the consequence
of gravitational rotation of the ether, the phenomenon of stellar aberration founds
its very simple and natural explanation.
At the
beginning of our analysis we mention the applicability of the Law of Mechanics
to light phenomena. The nature of light based on the Law of Mechanics is
discussed further in one of the following sections of this work. And now, for
our analysis of aberration, it is important to note that light is a material
object, which is a microscopic vortex of ether.
Light differs from other material objects in that it is inseparable from the gaseous (free) ether, since it is its wave (vortex). This means that light changes direction and speed synchronously with the movements of the ether (the medium whose waves light is).
This
concept does not contradict practice; it is perfectly normal for light to
behave in this way, it coincides with our daily experience in dealing with
material objects. Light moves synchronously with the Earth, which in turn moves
synchronously with the movement of the ether around it.
Let us clarify that now we will consider the interaction of light only with the surrounding ether (space). The interaction of light with material bodies in this section will not be considered.
Going back to the subject of aberration, we can remind about important idea put forward by George Stokes in 1845 to explain the aberration. The idea was that near the Earth the light-bearing ether moves together with the Earth, but at long distances from the Earth the ether is motionless.
The law of Mechanics helps to clarify this old idea: the gravitational vortex motion of the light-carrying ether moves the Earth, and also creates an observed picture of stellar aberration.
It is appropriate here to present interpretation, which helps to explain and to imagine the aberration: star aberration is the result of the curvature of the space of the Solar system.
The idea of
curvature of “space-time” was first formulated by relativists, but they
attributed entirely dissimilar properties and manifestations to curvature of
space. Relativists failed to recognize the phenomenon of curvature of space, when
they actually encountered with its effect in practice, in an unexpected place –
in the phenomenon of aberration.
In fact,
all near-earth space is curved by gravity. For example the curvature caused by
the Earth’s gravity – this curvature is quite stable. And the tides analyzed in
the previous section are variable curvatures imposed by lunar and solar gravity
on the near-earth space already curved by the Earth’s gravity. That is, the
tides are periodic changes in the angle between the horizon and the Zenith (the
angle having an average value of 90°).
Ending with
the topic of space curvature, we should mention that aberration gives us a tool
that allows us to study the shape and dynamics of the ethereal vortex in the
vicinity of the solar system.
****
An
important detail that distinguishes the explanation of aberration given by the
Law of Mechanics from the popular explanations, both classical and
relativistic: in our explanation, aberration does not depend on the speed of
the observer. The observer can move in any direction, or be motionless – the
instantaneous aberration pattern for a given location will be the same. The
aberration pattern in our explanation depends only on the position of the
observer in space.
Aberration
depends on the “history” of the rotation of space between the observed star
(the boundary of the solar system) and the Earth, i.e. the space itself rotates
along with the light on its way to the Earth.
Aberration as Gravitational Vortex Parallax
James
Bradley in 1727 discovered almost what he was looking for – parallax, but a
special kind of parallax, caused not by the movement of the Earth relative to
space, as he expected, but by the movement of Space relative to the Earth.
This
phenomenon was named as an aberration (from the Latin. aberratio — evasion <
aberrare — to deviate, err) — and, ironically, there was an “aberration” a
delusion, an aberration in the minds of researchers of the phenomenon.
Attention was switched from the geometric approach (parallax) to the kinematic
approach (velocity addition).
I hope that
the time will come when we will return to the original essence of the
phenomenon of “aberration”, and call it “parallax of space”, or more precisely
“Gravitational Vortex Parallax” (GVP).
I think that the name clarification is required also for the “simple” star parallax, which is very far from simple, as we will see in due time.
Let’s take a closer look at the aberration (GVP) shift. In the figure depicted GVP shift for the star located in the plane of the solar equator opposite the Earth.
The dotted
arc in the center represents the conditional boundary of the solar system – the
boundary between the slow (almost stationary) ether and the ether involved in
the solar gravitational vortex. Starting from this boundary, the ether
gradually accelerates its rotation around the sun. And the light coming from
the star, starting from this point will gradually increase its transverse shift
in its movement towards the Earth. It should be remembered that this transverse
component of motion is created only by the motion of space (the ether carrying
the light).
The distance “SL” is the distance between the Earth and the outer boundary of the solar system; throughout this distance, the star’s light experiences a transverse shift caused by the rotation of the solar system’s ether.
“t” is the time required for light to travel the SL distance at the speed of light.
The distance ST is the distance that the Earth (having a velocity v along with the surrounding ether) passes in time t. The distance ST is also equal to the transverse shift that starlight will have at the end of its path to Earth.
Assuming that t =20 hours
v = 30 km/s = 108000 km/h
ST=t*v=2160000 km
So, the
light from the star shifts about two million kilometers in the transverse
direction from the straight line, in the situation presented in the figure
above.
Simultaneously, the Earth moves the same distance and in the same direction over the same period of time.
The shift
of the Earth and the shift of light are accompanied by a simultaneous turn of
the direction of light. This is due to the rotation of the ether. The mechanism
of this rotation is very simple — since the entire volume of the ether rotates,
then the light turns along with the rotating medium (ether). The angular shift
of light that occurs due to the vortex nature of the rotation of the
light-conducting medium makes it possible to detect this hidden mechanism.
Vortex motion is characterized by a constant increase in the velocity of the
orbital motion of each subsequent layer of ether as it approaches the center of
the vortex.
As a
result, there is a turn in the direction of light propagation, while the light
is carried away by the ether in the transverse direction.
As it moves
in a gravitational vortex, the ether constantly experiences angular
acceleration. Each subsequent layer of ether has a greater orbital velocity
than the previous one. This process can be represented as an infinite number of
hyperfine layers of ether constantly rotating and having monotonically
increasing speeds of rotation as it approaches the Sun.
Thus, at
each given point of the near-solar space there will be a constant gradient of
the angular velocity of the ether, or in other words, a constant angular
acceleration of the ether.
The
rotation occurred not in the location of the light, but in the entire volume of
the ether. An analogy is the rotation of water in whirlpools.
The light
from the star will experience a twist along with the twists of the ether. The
individual rotation of the elementary volume of ether is equal to the sum of
the rotations of the elementary layers of ether preceding this layer from the
outer side of the solar system. Each such elementary rotation is proportional
to the speed difference of light-bearing layers, and the resulting rotation
will be equal to the sum of elementary rotations. That is, it will be
proportional to the sum of the accelerations of the ether on the path of light,
which is the speed of the ether on the orbit of the Earth (i.e., the orbital speed
of the Earth).
tg a= v / c , where a is the GVP angle (aberrations), v is the orbital velocity of the ether, c is the speed of light
Our
explanation of the mechanism of GVP (aberration) is drastically different from
the classical explanation – in our case, the rotation of light takes place not
in the telescope of the observer, but in space, and occurs gradually,
increasing at each subsequent point of the ether vortex, as it approaches the Sun.
Thus, the light coming into the telescope of the observer has a real angular
shift, which depends only on the location of the observer in space, and does
not depend on the speed of the observer, or on the change in the speed of light
inside the telescope (for example, as a result of filling the telescope with
water). Figuratively speaking, the role of the telescope, in which according to
organized science happens the shift and rotation of starlight, in our
explanation that role is performed by entire solar ether. (Telescope, which is
so loved to depict explaining the aberration).
The angle
of aberration gradually changes with the accelerations of the ether, and the
resulting angle of aberration is proportional to the sum of the accelerations
of the ether (just as the resulting orbital velocity of the ether is equal to
the sum of the accelerations).
Thus, each point of the solar system has its own angle of aberration corresponding to the orbital velocity of the ether at a given location, and this speed is correspondingly equal to the sum of the ether accelerations starting from zero speed (we attribute zero speed to the ether outside the solar system).
For cases
of aberration of light sources located inside the solar system, the shear angle
is determined by the difference in orbital velocities (the sum of
accelerations) between the ether surrounding the source and the ether at the
place of reception of light.
Speaking about the independence of the angle of aberration from the observer’s own speed, we can imagine a situation where the observer moves in the orbit in the opposite direction, i.e. has a speed different from the surrounding ether. In this situation, the light of the stars to the observer will come from the same directions as for the Earth observer. That is, for an observer moving towards the Earth, the angle of aberration will be negative with respect to its own speed (and not positive, as it would follow from the official approach). If the observer is able to stop in its movement in the earth’s orbit in front of a star, it will find that the star remains visible in the same direction as before during the movement.
Here we
will take a break from the discussion of aberration and return to parallax.
Parallax and its compensation by gravity, negative parallax
Parallax requires consideration, because of its special status as an assumed measure of star distances. Parallax is defined as the difference in angular directions towards star for two extreme lateral positions of the Earth. (Unlike aberration, the maximum of which is measured as the difference between the directions to a star from two positions of the Earth lying on the same line with the star.)
When James Bradley didn’t find the parallax he was looking for, everyone was satisfied with a simple explanation: – the stars are much farther away than expected – which is why parallax is very small. Later, with the advent of more accurate instruments, when parallax was finally measured, it was indeed much smaller than previously thought. No one suspected anything strange: stars in the perception of people just moved away from the Earth.
However, there was a new annoying obstacle — negative parallaxes. For almost half of the stars, the measured parallax was negative. The situation is scandalous, as based on this fact, we can conclude that the geocentric model of the universe is confirmed. There is still no rational “scientific” explanation for the phenomenon of negative parallaxes. Therefore, science here uses its most powerful method – the method of ignoring the facts. Negative parallax is declared either a measurement error or “devoid of physical sense”, as if nature could be dictated what could make sense and what could not.
The Law of Mechanics allows to explain both surprisingly small parallaxes and negative parallaxes.
The fact is that the gravitational vortex compensates the parallax, making it almost zero or even negative. Let’s see how it happens.
GVP (aberration) is accompanied by almost complete compensation of the transverse shift of star light. That is, the light coming from the stars is shifted by the moving space to the same distance as the Earth; leaving uncompensated (and hence observed) only the angular component of the shift of light.
At the
parallax measurement points, the angular shift between the two directions to
the star is almost completely compensated. This results in an almost zero value
of the measured parallax. Let’s analyze the mechanism of compensation of
changes in the angular directions of the stars.
First, we
emphasize that angular shifts (that is parallax) exist in undistorted space
extending from the observed star to the outer boundary of the gravitational
vortex of the Sun. But with the further movement of light through the gravitationally
curved ethereal space the parallax becomes almost equal to zero, as a result of
the compensation effect.
For the
most distant stars, the light from which at the points of entry into the solar
gravitational vortex moves along almost parallel lines, parallax becomes
negative. That is, parallel rays of light become divergent after passing
through the gravitational vortex of the ether. Let’s call the divergence angle
acquired by parallel rays, the parallax constant (not to be confused with the
aberration constant!).
Note that
the stellar parallax constant due to gravitational curvature leads to the
divergence of light and therefore is a negative value in contrast to the
geometric parallax. Geometric parallax is characterized by the convergence of
light.
And only
for the closest stars, the light at the points of entry into the solar
gravitational vortex has a significant relative angular shift. That is, the
angle of convergence of light from these stars is much greater than the angle
of divergence (parallax constant).
For the
nearest stars, the resulting parallax remains large enough to be reliably
measured. But, as a result of subtraction of the stellar parallax constant, the
actually measured parallax for the nearest stars decreases tenfold compared to
the idealized geometric parallax.
Lack of
understanding (unawareness) of this effect has led to the situation that the
measured parallaxes are taken for reality, and the distances to the stars from
the results of these measurements are absolutely fantastic.
And this is
despite the fact that other methods of estimating interstellar distances give
much smaller values. Thus blind faith in the infallibility of a single method
led to a gross error in the estimation of star distances.
This, in turn, led to a completely erroneous understanding of the structure of the immediate surroundings of the solar system with all the subsequent conclusions. Such as, the conclusion about the impossibility of interstellar travel. The visualization of the solar system’s surroundings after the “measurement” of parallax radically transformed, and instead of a fairly close star neighbourhood, these neighbourhoods were imagined to be consist of empty space.
Another
serious consequence of hyperbolization of star distances, was the error in
determining the size of celestial bodies, and as a consequence of their nature.
More on that later, and for now we will continue our analysis of the
parallaxes.
Most
obviously incorrect measurement of the parallax manifests itself in measurements
of the parallaxes of the “blue giants” stars that consistently give a
negative value. This is because these stars have very high luminosity,
especially when they are detected by photodetectors, which allows them to be
observed from a very long distance. Since the “blue giants” are at a
great distance, the undistorted by gravity (abstract, ideal) trigonometric
parallax for them is close to zero, and taking into account the parallax
constant, the measured real parallax becomes a negative value.
Here it is necessary to briefly mention the concept of space in accordance with the Law of Mechanics. This issue will be discussed in more detail in the section devoted to Time and Space. For consideration of parallax it is important to distinguish between the Absolute space in which the ether is located, and the space formed by this ether, we call it “ethereal space”. The ethereal space is the immediate space in which our world exists.
We have no possibility
of knowing what absolute space is, what its properties are, or whether it
contains anything other than ether. The only thing we can do is to assume that
absolute space has three dimensions. The easiest way to imagine absolute space
is in the form of emptiness. Absolute space cannot be curved, all three
dimensions are always linear and stable, it is just the emptiness in which the
ether is located.
Ethereal
space, unlike absolute space, can be curved / distorted. As a result of
inhomogeneities in the ether, the movements of free bodies or light in the
ether differ from their imagined motion in empty space. It is imaginary,
because neither light nor matter can move by themselves in empty space. The
reason for this impossibility in the case of light is quite obvious, and in the
case of matter the reason will be clear after reading the section about the
structure of matter in accordance with the Law of Mechanics.
Imaginary
motion in empty space can be substituted by motion in a stationary ether; this
is a fairly close analogy, differing from idealized motion in the void only at
great speeds and great distances. That is, the differences of real movement
from the ideal are due to the “Law of Mechanics for Speeds” (see 1st
section).
To sum up,
any movement of the ether is a distortion of space. To be detectable, the movements
of the ether must be relative to the observer.
The
curvature of space is always dynamic, that is, always caused by the motion of
the ether. If a sufficiently large volume of ether moves synchronously, then
with some approximation it can be assumed that during the preservation of
synchronicity (of the motion of the ether), the space is not distorted.
This
situation is typical for example for the space adjacent to the Earth’s orbit,
which is an ether moving synchronously with the Earth around the Sun. It is
possible to assume with a certain error that within several hundred thousand
kilometers from the Earth orbit the near-earth space is linear. But if we
consider the solar system as a whole, there is a significant curvature of the near-solar
space. Since the speed of the ether is changing with the distance from the Sun.
Similarly,
if we consider the near-earth space as a whole, it is also curved by gravity.
But for a ground observer it is hardly noticeable.
Ending with
the theme of the curvature of space, we need to clarify that solids entering
the curved space do not bend with the space (do not change their sizes,
although the trajectories of the bodies may change). This applies primarily to
elementary particles and atoms, and then to solids composed of them (liquids
and gases behave differently). As discussed at the very beginning of this work,
solids experience internal stresses as a result of the acceleration of the
ether through them.
Based on
the above, the corresponding Consequence of the Law of Mechanics may have an
alternative formulation: “Solids experience internal stresses as a result of
the curvature of space” (see section 1).
This refinement is necessary because the explanation of the curvature of space given by organized science involves the curvature of solid matter along with the curvature of “space-time”. The Law of Mechanics in contrast to the official theories has a very clear and distinct idea of the nature of space and matter, considering the categories of space and matter in their dialectical unity-independence.
Back to parallax.
Depending
on the distance to a given star, there are three possible scenarios for how the
parallax constant affects the measured parallax value.
1. The star
is close to the solar vortex — in this case, the trigonometric parallax is
large enough, and after addition to the parallax constant still gives a small
positive value. Orthodox science considers this value as a real parallax, and
builds all subsequent calculations of star distances, based on this value. As a
result of using these extremely low parallax values, we get inflated distances
to stars.
2. The star
is located at a distance at which the parallax angle at the boundary of the
solar system is approximately equal to the magnitude of the parallax constant —
in this case, the result of adding an idealized trigonometric parallax with the
parallax constant is close to zero. Science believes that the star is so far
away from us that parallax is immeasurable, or is within the error of
measurement.
3. The star
is so far away that the idealized trigonometric parallax is less than the
parallax constant — in this case, the result of their addition is a negative
value. Science ignores this result. But in fact, the largest negative parallax
is an indicator of the greatest distance from the Earth. In this case, the
abstract trigonometric parallax is close to zero, and the result is almost all
equal to the parallax constant.
GVP works like a lens that deflects light. But unlike the lens, which simultaneously bends the light coming from both sides, GVP always bends the light in only one direction and the angle of deviation depends on the position of the Earth on its orbit around the Sun.
Six months
later, the direction of deviation remains the same, but its angle changes. That
is, the comparison of deflection angles can be made only after six months.
A very important feature of GVP is that the angular shift increases with the approach of the star to the Sun, i.e. the closer the star to the Sun, the further GVP moves it away from the Earth. For nearby stars, the angular shift from GVP increases due to the increase in the angle of entry of light into the gravitational solar vortex, which increases the interaction of light with the angular acceleration of the ether. Thus, the error in determining the distance by the parallax method for the nearest stars can be much larger than about one millisecond of the angle, which is typical for distant stars and infinity.
So, GVP
works in such a way that it actually “deceives” observers who want to
use parallax to measure the distance to stars.
However, parallax can be used to measure the distance to stars, we only need to take into account the GVP effect in the calculations. Moreover, it is necessary to create a celestial map on the basis of dynamic parallax (GVP). It is on the creation of such a map it is necessary to direct the efforts of mathematicians; such a task is ideal for mathematics as a tool destined to improve the efficiency and accuracy of measurements.
and other effects caused by the rotational component of gravity
One of the most obvious effects of rotational gravity is the phenomenon of tides, but at the same time, this phenomenon is quite difficult to analyze. Therefore, this section only in General terms describes the mechanism of tides, avoiding details. Needless to say, our explanation of tides is completely different from the orthodox explanation.
First of all, let’s define the general principles of our approach.
First:
water, like any liquid, is a material body that has freedom of movement with
ether. That is, if the ether is accelerated, the water is accelerated along
with the ether. This behavior is typical for bodies that are not restricted in
their movement by other bodies.
The situation when bodies have complete freedom of movement with ether (weightlessness) was considered in the first Chapter of this work — introduction to the Law of Mechanics. But in the case of tides, we can only talk about the relative freedom of movement of water with ether — only along the surface of the Earth. The movement down, following the absorbed ether, is prevented by the Earth’s surface.
The relativity of the freedom of movement of water is also in the fact that the water meets a certain resistance to its movement along the surface of the Earth because of water’s own viscosity and friction by the bottom and the shore. To paraphrase all of the above: the movement of water reflects the speed of the ether with some rough approximation.
The
velocity of solids stationary on the Earth is equal to the velocity of the Earth’s
surface, and these solids only “feel” the forces of inertia applied
to them from the ether, but do not shift when the ether accelerates through
them. Unlike solids, water changes its speed along with the speed of the ether,
and “feels” the forces of inertia only in case of meeting any solid
obstacles in its path.
Thus, in
our analysis of tides based on the Law of Mechanics, we will review changes in
the speed of the ether relative to
the Earth’s surface at different orientations relative to the Sun and Moon. The
acceleration of the ether in this
case plays a secondary role.
The second
principle point is related to the nature of the interaction of celestial
bodies, in this case the Earth, the Moon and the Sun. Tidal interaction is conveyed
through the ether. The Earth interacts only with the surrounding (local) ether,
the Sun and the Moon also interact only with the surrounding (local) ether.
This can be called the principle of locality, more about this principle in the
section devoted to space and time. In the case of tides, this principle is very
clear and macroscopic, making it very understandable.
In this
Chapter, we will try to explain the reality of the presence of two individual
(independent) tidal mechanisms: daily and semi-daily, and examine the processes
that cause them.
Solar semi-diurnal component of the tides
This
component of the tides, considered individually, is a mechanism that directly
transmits the movement of the ether to the water. Reviewing separately the
solar half-day component, we suppose that the ether surrounding the Earth moves
only under the action of the Sun without any other disturbances. And the planet
Earth just moves along with this ether and rotates in this uniform flow without
exciting any of its own ether vortexes. Such simplification allows to extract
the final phase of originating of tides, — a phase of interaction of a
near-earth ether with water.
The first
case is a half-day (twice a day) component of the tides.
The picture
below shows in the most general terms the interaction of two celestial bodies,
blue – Earth, and red – Sun.
Half-day
tides occur because the earth’s axial rotation creates a difference in relative
velocity between the Earth’s surface and the surrounding ether. For each given
location, this speed difference increases and decreases twice a day, and all
the time it has the same direction.
When a given surface of the Earth faces the Sun, the velocity of the Earth’s axial rotation is subtracted from the Earth’s orbital velocity, making the resulting velocity of that surface less than the velocity of the surrounding ether, which moves at the Earth’s orbital velocity. This surface will experience the force exerted by the ether accelerating through the earth’s surface (according to the Law of Mechanics). This tidal force will create stresses inside the solid Earth, and the flow of water in the ocean directed against the direction of rotation of the Earth (from East to West). And for the same reason, when the same surface is facing in the direction opposite to the Sun, the speed of the earth’s axial rotation is added to the Earth’s orbital speed, making the speed of this section of the surface faster than the speed of the surrounding ether. This will create a tidal flow in the same direction – from East to West. As a result – twice a day we have a tidal current in the same direction, and twice a day no current.
We started
with the solar half-day component because the solar etheric vortex is dominant.
Gravitational vortices produced by all other celestial bodies are only
superimposed on the solar vortex, modifying its direction and speed.
After
reaching understanding in general the mechanism of transmission of motion from
ether to water, we can proceed to the analysis of fluctuations in the ether.
The real ethereal flow that the Earth encounters is not uniform and
homogeneous. It is constantly distorted by the gravity of the Earth itself, the
Moon and other celestial bodies. These distortions are responsible for the
presence of various components of the tides. Most of these influences have a
periodic nature and can be estimated, it is only necessary that these computations
had a conscious nature, that is, created in accordance with a clearly comprehended
physical mechanism.
Solar diurnal component of tides
The second
case – daily (once a day) components of tides.
The picture
below illustrates the daily tidal mechanism. This is the “ether-ether”
interaction that takes place before the ether contacts the substance.
Daily tides
are created because of the interaction of the rotating flow of ether (a vortex
created by the earth’s own gravity) with the orbital flow of ether, which moves
the Earth around the Sun. In other words, the daily tides are the result of the
modulation of the orbital stream of the ether by the gravitational vortex of
the Earth.
On the sun-facing side of the Earth, the ether, which rotates synchronously with the Earth, slows the ether moving in the opposite direction (30 km/s – 0.465 km/s). This creates a slowdown in the resulting flow of ether interacting with the Earth’s surface, and as a result – the flow of water in the direction from East to West.
When the
same surface looks in the opposite direction from the Sun, the ether rotating
with the Earth accelerates the orbital flux of the ether caused by the Sun and
moving in the same direction (30 km/s + 0.465 km/s). This creates an
acceleration of the resulting flow of ether, and as a result – the flow of
water in the direction from West to East.
As we can
see, this mechanism also causes two water flows and two stops, but the
directions of the two flows are opposite, so during the day we have one tide and
one ebb.
As we can
see, the second (daily) tide mechanism works in the direction of reducing the
effect of the first (half-day) tide mechanism. This compensation is not complete;
it only reduces the resulting force of the solar half-day tides. Therefore, the
half-day component of the solar tides is less than the daily component.
The lunar tides
The same mechanisms apply in the case of lunar half-day and daily tides, only in this case the duration of half a day is 12 hours, 25 minutes.
The fact
that the Moon does not rotate around its own axis does not change the behavior
of the ether that the Moon absorbs. This ether revolves around the Moon in the
same way as it revolves around other celestial bodies with gravity.
The lunar
ether vortex is not strong enough to overcome the tidal influence of the Earth,
and to spin the moon (the so-called tidal lock – see the half-day solar tidal
mechanism – which acts in the direction of braking the axial rotation of the
Earth).
Super-rotation of atmosphere
It is worth mentioning here that the discussed above tidal block mechanism is also related to the super-rotation of the atmosphere, which is observed when a celestial body is a satellite having its own gravity and atmosphere, has an orbit too close to the host planet or star. As is the cases with Venus or Titan, which are both close enough to their central gravitational partners to become tidal-blocked satellites, and both have atmospheres that make the super-rotation effect visible. The effect of super-rotation allows us to see the rotation of the gravitational vortex of the ether due to the atmosphere having more freedom to follow the rotating ether than the celestial body itself, which producing the ether vortex.
Back to the Moon’s half-day tides.
In the
figure below, solar gravity has the same effect on the Earth and on the Moon,
so we do not take solar gravity into account at this stage of our analysis.
Also, the rotation of the ether caused by the Earth’s gravity is synchronized
with the daily rotation of the Earth, so we do not take into account the
Earth’s gravity. This approach in the analysis of the half-day tides caused by
the Moon leaves us to consider only the lunar gravity.
Also, this
approach along the way (gives an answer to) reveals a very important fact to
which orthodox explanations of tides give a completely unsatisfactory answer.
The question is, “Why does the Moon, which has very little gravity on the Earth’s
surface compared to Solar gravity, have a much stronger tidal effect on the
Earth?»
The answer
given by the Law of Mechanics: the Earth is at rest relative to the combined solar-terrestrial
gravitational vortex. But the Lunar vortex, despite its relative weakness, is
not compensated at all, and is entirely applied to the Earth. The lunar
gravitational vortex constantly changes its position relative to the Earth.
In fact,
tides are caused by the Earth’s own rotation as such, or more precisely – tides
are caused by the interaction of the Earth with the surrounding ether, we
mentioned this earlier, speaking about the principle of locality. The Moon and
the Sun only affect the shape and behavior of the ether that surrounds them;
there is no direct interaction between the Earth and the Sun or the Moon.
This also
explains why there are time delays between the highest or lowest tides and the
extremes in the Moon’s position (the so-called tide age). The Earth always
interacts with the ether, which is in direct contact with the Earth; and the
ether, which was under the influence of the Moon, takes time to convey its
state to the ether in contact with the Earth. Therefore, the Earth’s
gravitational vortex reaches the corresponding state of the highest or lowest
tide somewhere further in space; and the corresponding position depends on the
trajectories and characteristics of all participants in the interaction: the
Sun, Moon, Earth and Ether. Therefore, it is so difficult to recognize a
certain pattern responsible for apparently unpredictable tidal delays.
Knowing
these delays gives us valuable information about the properties of the ether —
such as its speed and ability to maintain shape and movement.
Lunar diurnal tides
As we can
see from the illustration for the lunar daily tides, its mechanism uses the
same principle as the solar daily tides.
The main
difference between the Solar and Lunar daily components of tides:
— In the
case of the Moon – the effect of weak lunar gravity at a distance of 300,000
kilometers affects the Earth’s gravity.
— In the
case of the Sun – the stronger gravity of the Earth at a distance of 0 km,
affects the solar gravity.
Therefore,
the lunar daily tides are the smallest components of the four main tidal
components. In addition, the lunar diurnal mechanism produces the least
inhibitory effect on the lunar semi-diurnal component, thus helping the lunar
semi-diurnal component to be the largest of the four major tidal components.
There is
also a strong dependence of the lunar daily tides from the declination of the
moon, and the greater the declination (the deviation of the moon’s orbit from
the equator) in one direction or another, the greater the amplitude of the
daily tides. This can also be explained by our theory, since the daily tides
are not the effect of direct action, but influence the half-day tides,
modifying them, also here asymmetric modulation plays its role. The greater the
modulation asymmetry, the more noticeable it is.
The full
description of the tides is not so simple. It should include a large number of
other effects and factors that determine the behavior of tides at a certain
place at a certain time. Some of these factors, especially the tilt of the
earth’s axis and the parameters of the lunar orbit, may be worth considering in
a separate article later. But now, our goal is to show in general terms:
a) a mechanism that directly creates tidal currents — as an alternative to the universally accepted belief in “tidal humps” rolling around the Earth, and being the root cause of tidal currents;
b) two periodic forces that create two independent, simultaneous waves, one with a daily, and one with a half-day period. Instead of the generally accepted belief in the existence of a single mechanism of tides with a half-day frequency; and the formation of the daily component as a subharmonic of a half-day component.
(c) Please do not confuse this paragraph with paragraph ”a”, which deals with the direct mechanism of the tidal forces. Here we are talking about the celestial bodies causing gravitational flows of ether, which then after a certain period of time come into contact with the Earth, and begin to act on it.
The Sun and the Moon are act upon Earth by their gravity not directly, but indirectly, through the ether. This creates delays and shifts in the application of tidal forces.
This in
particular explains the efficiency of the method of so-called “fictitious
luminaries”, which is used by official science. Indeed, tides are not caused by
the Sun and the Moon directly by the direct action of the “gravitational force”
(no matter what speed of action). In fact, the tides are caused indirectly by
the Sun and the Moon disturbing the ether around them. And only then, the Earth
comes into direct contact with the traces of the impact on the ether left by
celestial bodies in the form of an agitated ether. In this case, there is the
illusion of the action of fictitious luminaries, since the position of the moon
does not coincide with its delayed effect.
At this
point, we will finish the analysis of tides, as at the moment other topics
related to rotational gravity, are much more important for understanding the
world around us based on the Law of Mechanics. Such topics are stellar
aberration and parallax, which are discussed in the next section.
The theme
of tides is interesting mainly as an example of the application of the Law of
Mechanics to the problem, which was not resolved by the official science. It
would be unproductive to spend too much time on the tides now, it is enough to
consider this topic in general and move on.
Previously, we have reviewed the rotational motion from the standpoint of the Law of Mechanics. At that time, our attention was focused on the rotational motion of celestial bodies with gravity, that is, self-rotation under the action of the absorbed ether.
The main distinguishing feature of this rotation is the absence of centrifugal forces. Centrifugal forces do not occur on the surfaces of celestial bodies rotating around their own axis, as the ether surrounding them rotates synchronously with them. This ether is driven by the heavenly bodies themselves, as they absorb ether producing gravity.
But for celestial bodies that do not have gravity, the situation is completely different.
During the rotation of such bodies the centrifugal force is produced, because rotation occurs in still ether.
In this article we will review this, the most common type of rotational motion — the rotation of bodies in a stationary ether.
In this case, the ether does not rotate with the body and therefore the body experiences centrifugal forces. Centrifugal forces are caused by the acceleration of body parts relative to the ether.
Accelerations of parts of the body are directed to the axis of rotation and therefore are called centripetal accelerations. And since the atoms of a solid body move with acceleration relative to the fixed ether, the mechanical forth is applied to atoms of the body from stationary ether .
Our model of the structure of substance which corresponds to the mechanism of ether seeping through internal atomic gaps, how it is described here, is considered in the section of this work, which devoted to the structure of substance.
In the type of rotational motion under consideration, accelerations exist even if the rotation occurs at a constant angular velocity; these accelerations occur due to a constant change in the direction of the ether flow inside the body.
Rotational motion is the simplest example of the interaction of the body only with ether, and nothing but ether.
In the case of free rotation, the body does not interact with other bodies, and this circumstance drives Newtonian mechanics into paralysis. According to Newtonian mechanics, forces arise only as a result of interactions between bodies. And since there is no interaction of bodies, it is impossible to apply Newton’s Third law, and there are problems with the Second law also.
Organized science does not know what to do with the centrifugal force that occurs during rotational movements. Centrifugal force even declare a fictitious, conditionally introduced, as it is directed against centripetal acceleration, which creates it. The problem here is the fundamental incorrectness of Newton’s Second law, according to which the force coincides in the direction with the acceleration given to the body. That is, Newton’s Second law could hypothetically recognize the existence of only a ”centripetal force”, which would correspond to the centripetal acceleration, but such a force somehow does not arise independently…
For an unbiased mind, it is enough to analyze the explanations of rotational motion given by the Law of Mechanics to ascertain that Newton’s laws are inadequate.
According to the Law of Mechanics, the forces exerted to the bodies during acceleration of the ether relative to the bodies; and the direction of the force coincides with the direction of the acceleration of the ether, and that happens in case of rotation.
The limitation of Newton’s Second law is that it applies only to rectilinear movements, and only to accelerated movements (that is, movements with increasing speed). As soon as braking occurs and the force of inertia takes effect, Newton’s second law becomes unusable. Therefore, ” inertial and non-inertial reference systems “were invented, and the force of inertia fell into the category of “fictitious” forces, whatever that means…
With accelerated rectilinear motion, the body is in contact with another (accelerating, pushing or pulling) body, and therefore there is an illusion that the force arises from the action of this accelerating body. But in the case of rotational motion, the interacting (second) body is not available, and yet the force (centrifugal) occurs. (Do not be in a hurry to be indignant about the “illusion”, an explanation of this heresy will be given in due time.)
We supplement an explanation of the centrifugal forces of rotational motion given by the Law of Mechanics by simple mathematics.
The formula of centripetal acceleration of body parts in the case of rotational motion is derived from geometric analysis:
a = w2r (The text editor of this site does not allow to insert mathematical formulas, so the formulas will be translated into images and added to the text later.)
That is, according to the geometry, all particles of the body are accelerated towards the axis of rotation, and for each individual particle of the body, the centripetal acceleration is equal to the product of the square of the angular velocity of rotation of the body (w2) by the distance to the axis of rotation (r).
The acceleration of the body through the ether is equivalent to the acceleration of the ether through the body in the opposite direction. Therefore, the force applied to the body is directed in the opposite direction from the centripetal acceleration of the body parts. Thus, the centripetal acceleration of the body turns into a centrifugal force applied to the body.
By the same way materialized the force of inertia during rectilinear movements — the force of inertia is always directed opposite to the acceleration of the body (the direction of increasing the speed of the body).
To paraphrase, the force of inertia always coincides with the direction of the body’s deceleration.
Typically, accelerations are understood as both types of changes in the velocity of the body. Both the increase and decrease in speed are called accelerations, which differ only in signs (positive or negative).
But the Law of Mechanics specifies that true acceleration (increase in speed) leads to the emergence of forces directed against the movement of the body. A slowdown causes the force coinciding with the direction of movement of the body.
So, to sum up:
From the point of view of the Law of Mechanics, the centrifugal force is the only real force acting on the body in the case of uniform rotational motion.
Here we will interrupt the review of rotational motion, as the logic of presentation will require us to switch to other questions.
The process of turning Ether into a Substance as the cause of Gravity
The main theses on which our model is built:
The substance is hardened (compressed and compacted) ether.
The Earth and the Sun constantly absorb the ether from their surrounding space.
The absorbed gaseous ether inside the planet is compressed to a solid state, as a result, the volume occupied by the ether is sharply reduced.
The absorbed ether moving to the planet twists and forms a whirlwind.
Ether is the immediate space in which our world exists. The vortex motion of the ether around the Sun is the movement of the space in which the Earth is located.
The vortex shape causes the appearance of the curvature, that is, our space has a curvature, and this curvature has a dynamic nature.
(A drawing is planned here)
The condensation of ether into a substance is similar to the process of condensation of real gas into a liquid. When gases condense, their pressure drops and heat is generated.
But unlike real gases, the transition ether-substance leads to a much larger jump in density. A rough estimate of the decrease in the volume of ether gives a value of the order of one trillion (this figure needs to be justified and revised). That is, the packing density of ether in a substance is a trillion times higher than in the surrounding free gaseous ether.
The pressure of the surrounding ether causes the nearby ether to fill the newly creating void.
The aether filling a continuously freeing volume inside the planet is equivalent to the continuous falling of the aether towards the center of the Earth.
The acceleration of the fluxes absorbed from all directions of the ether is directed towards the center of the planet.
The highest acceleration is achieved at the depth of the maximum level of absorption of the aether, the acceleration of the aether decreases with distance from this depth in proportion to the square of the distance.
Let’s mention some of the details that are important to our presentation:
Ether condenses into a substance in a certain depth range inside the planet, at which the pressure and acceleration of the ether reach the values necessary for such condensation.
The process of condensation of the ether in the depths of the planets and stars is self-sustained.
Heat removal ensures the process irreversibility (stability of the condensate).
Our model for its workability requires the presence of three functionally different layers in the structure of the planet.
Brief description of these layers from top to bottom:
1 – The outer layer, in which the ether continues to accelerate, and gravity still exists. This layer does not produce gravity, but helps to create it, by exerting pressure on the underlying layers, this pressure is created by the weight of the substance composing the outer layer.
2 – Transforming layer, in which the ether turns into a substance. This layer generates gravity, produces matter and releases energy. Below this layer, gravity does not exist (come to an end).
3 – The core – the ether in the core is not accelerated, and therefore there is no gravity in the core. The core is subjected to high pressure created by the upper layers of the planet. Although the core does not directly generate gravity, its role is very important, since the core serves as a support for the entire system, creating the conditions for the absorption of ether from all directions. The size of the core determines the size of the region of gravitational influence of the planet or star.
Change of gravitational acceleration”g” with the distance from planet’s centre. Far away from planet gravitation is weak and sharply increases up to the maximum (critical). In the core gravitation is zero.
As we can see, our model for its functioning requires three specific layers inside the planets. The characteristics of these layers in general coincide with the ideas about the internal structure of the planet, obtained empirically on the basis of seismological data. Therefore, our theory gives an explanation to the current understanding of the internal structure of the planet:
— The outer layer corresponds to the planetary crust and the upper part of
the mantle.
— Transform layer corresponds to the lower mantle and the outer core.
— The core corresponds to the solid core of the planet.
The process of creating a substance from the vortex of ether is accompanied
by the release of energy; and this process by itself is a source of internal
energy of planets and stars. This energy heats and melts the substance of the
transformation layer, providing conditions for independent movement of the core
with viscous friction relative to the surrounding layers.
The newly created substance is added to the material of the Earth – and the
Earth increases in size.
There are a lot of evidences of the growth of the Earth and the increase in
its gravity. Those interested can find numerous materials and studies on this
topic.
The growth of the Earth is the cause of continental drift and the cause of constant
recreation of mineral resources such as water, atmospheric gases and especially
hydrogen. Hydrogen and helium are constantly released from the innermost parts
of the Earth and then escape into space, forming a helium-hydrogen plume (andthe
exosphere).
The gravity on the planet’s surface increases as planet grows.
On ancient Earth, gravity was much smaller than it is today. Because of that
the existence of such giant animals as dinosaurs was possible.
The rise of gravity has led to the extinction of large flying birds that
existed in the past. Other large birds have lost the ability to fly in an
ever-increasing acceleration of free fall.
All three layers of the Earth and other planets grow, but the relative sizes
of the layers also change with the size of the planets. The larger the planet
becomes, the greater the share of the core inside of it, since the ether
reaches a critical acceleration at a relatively smaller depth. Large stars
should have core almost equal to their outer size and relatively thin outer
layers with gravity, which produce energy and matter.
The transformation of the ether into a substance is accompanied by the liberation
of energy released at a sharp stop of the ether flow, moving before with the
first cosmic speed. The increase in the size of the transformation layer leads
to an increase in the volume of the absorbed ether and, accordingly, the produced
energy.
The relative thinning of the outer layer with increasing size and energy dissipation
leads to an accelerated increase in temperature on the surface of the planets.
That is, there is a natural relationship between the size of the planet and its
temperature. The larger the planet – the hotter its surface.
Here we discuss only the physical effects happening on planets in their
evolution, without being distracted by their effects on biological and social
systems. Topic about the prospects for life on Earth is left for a separate
section at the end of this work.
The larger the planet grows, the greater part of the energy and matter
released in the process of gravity is thrown away into the surrounding space.
The ultimate situation materialized, when a star ceases to grow, but continues
to produce light and matter and all created matter is completely thrown into
the surrounding space. This situation is considered in the section devoted to
galaxies and their nuclei.
But in the case of a relatively young star, like our Sun, the new matter
created by gravity partially remains on the star, contributing to its growth,
and partially is carried away into the surrounding space, forming the so-called
solar wind.
Another additional process helps to remove heat and shift the balance
towards the stabilization of the substance, despite the extremely hot
surrounding layers. These are endothermic reactions of nuclear fusion of heavy
elements from the lighter ones.
Thus, the creation of an abundance of mineral resources is a side effect of
the process of cooling of stars and planets.
So gravity provides not only energy, but also substance from the lightest to
the heaviest elements. Simultaneously, gravity provides the place (surface and
space) to stay for live, and mineral objects.
Later, in the section devoted to heat, we will consider one more important
function of heat generated by gravity. This property of heat, without which it
is impossible to form material bodies, is still outside the scope of official
science.
So, everything that we see around us: the Sun emitting light and the solar
system rotating around it, the whole material universe – are the products of
the process of gravity, that is, the transformation of the ether into substance.
It is obvious that the gas giants occupy an intermediate position between
the planets of the Earth type and the stars, having larger than the Earth size,
temperature and denser atmosphere.
As a result of further growth, in the future Jupiter will become a brown
dwarf, then red, and the solar system will have a double star.
Due to the fact that the maximum limit of the level of gravity (acceleration
of the ether) is reached as soon as the star grows to the ignition point and
begins to emit light, the star also reaches close to the maximum level of
gravity on its surface. Therefore, the magnitude of gravity on the surfaces of
all stars should not differ too significantly. It is also possible to estimate
the maximum possible level of gravity – it should be close to the level of
gravity at a depth close to the Earth’s core.
There is also the opposite side of the process of constant creation of a
substance from the condensing ether. The density of the ether around the stars
gradually decreases, thus changing the properties of space and changing physical
constants, such as the speed of light.
Those interested can find studies on the phenomenon of a gradual decrease in
the speed of light detected in the analysis of historical data and the results
of measurements made at different epochs.
Gradually, the parameters of space change to such an extent that the
substance ceases to be stable, or to such a level that gravity cannot
compensate for the internal pressure of the star. As a result, the star breaks
apart, releasing previously bound partially ether and partially forming a swarm
of small parts, the building blocks of future planets and stars; and giving the
beginning of a new cycle of the endless process of transformation of Ether.
Universal gravitation, as the property of any material body to attract other
material bodies, does not exist. Material masses in themselves do not cause
attraction. Small celestial bodies (such as asteroids or small satellites) do
not have their own gravity. There is a lot of evidences for this, for example,
futile attempts to put satellites into orbit around asteroids and unsuccessful
attempts to land spacecraft on a comet.
Gravity is an accelerating stream of ether, and after its formation within a
sufficiently large body, the stream becomes self-sustained, constantly
producing matter and energy until the moment of self-destruction.
But how does the process of gravity begin? One possible mechanism for
starting gravity is the collision of two sufficiently large celestial bodies having
sufficiently large relative velocities. Very high pressures and accelerations
of the ether that occur during the collision can create conditions for the
formation of matter — and the gravitational reactor will begin to work.
In favor of this scenario, is the discovery of mascons (mass concentrations)
on the moon, and especially the fact that mascons tend to coincide with impact
craters and also have a higher temperature compared to the surrounding surface.
It is likely that the mascons are relatively new gravitational reactors formed
as a result of the collision of the moon with asteroids.
The map of lunar gravity below is interesting because the acceleration of
gravity above all craters is greater than over the surrounding surface. That
is, any collision with the Moon sufficiently large asteroids leads to increased
gravity in the area of the impact crater. On the example of the Moon we can see
how the early gravitational complex is growing. Even relatively small impacts
are always superimposed on the background gravitational level and enhance it in
this place. Once the planet grows to a sufficiently large size, all these new additions
are not so noticeable. And completely invisible on larger planets and stars.
— The outer layer corresponds to the planetary crust and the upper part of the mantle.
— Transform layer corresponds to the lower mantle and the outer core.
— The core corresponds to the solid core of the planet.
The process of creating a substance from the vortex of ether is accompanied by the release of energy, and is a source of internal energy of planets and stars. This energy heats and melts the substance of the transformation layer, providing conditions for independent movement of the core with viscous friction relative to the surrounding layers.
The newly created substance is added to the material of the Earth – and the Earth increases in size.
There is a lot of evidence of the growth of the Earth and the increase in gravity. Those interested can find numerous materials and studies on this topic.
The growth of the Earth is the cause of continental drift and the constant recreation of mineral resources such as water, atmospheric gases and especially hydrogen. Hydrogen and helium are constantly released from the innermost parts of the Earth and then evaporate into space, forming a helium-hydrogen plume (the exosphere).
The gravity on the planet’s surface increases as it grows.
On ancient Earth, gravity was much smaller than it is today. Because of this, it was possible the existence of such giant animals as dinosaurs.
The rise of gravity has led to the extinction of large birds that existed in the past. Other large birds have lost the ability to fly in an ever-increasing acceleration of free fall.
All three layers of the Earth and other planets grow, but the relative sizes of the layers also change with the size of the planets. The larger the planet becomes, the greater the share of the nucleus in it, since the ether reaches a critical acceleration at a relatively lower depth. Large stars should have nuclei almost equal to their outer size and relatively thin outer layers with gravity that produce energy and matter.
The transformation of the ether into a substance is accompanied by the release of energy released at a sharp stop of the ether flow, moving before with approximately the first cosmic speed. The increase in the size of the transforming layer leads to an increase in the volume of the absorbed ether and, accordingly, the released energy.
The relative thinning of the outer layer with increasing size and energy release leads to an accelerated increase in temperature on the surface of the planets. That is, there is a natural relationship between the size of the planet and its temperature. The larger the planet, the hotter its surface.
Here we discuss only the physical effects occurring on planets in their evolution, without being distracted by their effects on biological and social systems. Talk about the prospects for life on Earth is put in a separate section at the end of this work.
The larger the planet grows, the greater part of the energy and matter released in the process of gravity is thrown into the surrounding space. The ultimate situation, when a star ceases to grow, but continues to produce light and matter and all created matter is completely thrown into the surrounding space, is considered in the section devoted to galaxies and their nuclei.
And in the case of a relatively young star, like our Sun, the new matter created by gravity partially remains on the star, contributing to its growth, and partially is carried away into the surrounding space, forming the so-called solar wind.
Another additional process that helps to remove heat and shift the balance towards the stabilization of the substance, despite the extremely hot surrounding layers. These are endothermic reactions of nuclear fusion of heavy elements from light elements.
Thus, a side effect of the cooling process is the creation of an abundance of mineral resources.
So gravity provides not only energy, but also matter from the lightest to the heaviest elements. Simultaneously, gravity provides the location (surface and space) to stay alive, and mineral objects.
Later, in the section devoted to heat, we will consider one more important function of heat generated by gravity. This property of heat, without which it is impossible to form real bodies, is still outside the field of view of official science.
So, everything that we see around us: the Sun emitting light and the solar system rotating around it, the whole material universe – are the fruits of the process of gravity, that is, the transformation of the ether into matter.
It is obvious that the gas giants occupy an intermediate position between the planets of the earth type and the stars, having larger than the Earth size, temperature and denser atmosphere.
As a result of further growth, in the future Jupiter will become a brown dwarf, then red, and the solar system will have a double star.
Due to the fact that the maximum limit of the level of gravity (acceleration of the ether) is reached as soon as the star grows to the ignition point and begins to emit light, the star also reaches close to the maximum level of gravity on its surface. Therefore, the magnitude of gravity on the surfaces of all stars should not differ too significantly. It is also possible to estimate the maximum possible level of gravity – it should be close to the level of gravity at a depth close to the earth’s core.
There is also the reverse side of the process of constant creation of a substance from the condensing ether. The density of the ether around the stars gradually decreases, thus changing the properties of space and physical constants, such as the speed of light.
Those interested can find studies on the phenomenon of a gradual decrease in the speed of light detected in the analysis of historical data and the results of measurements made at different times.
Gradually, the parameters of space change to such an extent that the substance ceases to be stable, or to such a level that gravity can not compensate for the internal pressure of the star. As a result, the star breaks apart, releasing previously bound partially free ether and partially forming a plurality of small parts, the building blocks of future planets and stars; and giving the beginning of a new cycle of the endless process of transformation of Ether.
Universal gravitation, as the property of any body to attract other real bodies, does not exist. Material masses by themselves do not cause attraction. Small celestial bodies (such as asteroids or small satellites) do not have their own gravity. There is a lot of evidence for this, for example, futile attempts to put satellites into orbit around asteroids and unsuccessful attempts to land spacecraft on a comet.
Gravity is an accelerating stream of ether, and after its formation within a sufficiently large body, the stream becomes self-sustained, constantly producing matter and energy until the moment of self-decay.
But how does the process of gravity begin? One possible mechanism for starting gravity is the collision of two sufficiently large celestial bodies with sufficiently large relative velocities. Very high pressures and accelerations of the ether that occur during the collision can create conditions for the formation of matter — and the gravitational reactor will begin to work.
In favor of this scenario, the discovery of mascoons (mass concentrations) on the moon, and especially the fact that mascoons tend to coincide with impact craters and have a higher temperature compared to the surrounding surface. It is likely that the maskons are relatively recent gravitational reactors formed as a result of the collision of the moon with asteroids.
The map of lunar gravity below is interesting because the acceleration of gravity over all craters is greater than over the surrounding surface. That is, any collision with the Moon sufficiently large asteroids leads to increased gravity in the area of the impact crater. On the example of the Moon we can see the growing of not yet formed, early gravitational complex. Even relatively small impacts are always superimposed on the background gravitational ability of the absorption of ether and enhance it in this place. Once the planet grows to a sufficiently large size, all these new additions are not so noticeable. And completely concealed on even larger planets and stars.
On this map, the whole history of the moon is in plain sight: it is clear that the Moon is growing and its total gravitational capability grows also.
For comparison, the gravitational map of Mars, which has about twice the diameter of the Moon. The map of the Moon has about twice better resolution of gravity acceleration than the map of Mars, but nevertheless a comparison of the general features of gravity is possible. The gravity of Mars is smoother, despite numerous craters on its surface. This suggests that the local gravitational regions, which are typical for the Moon, merged into a common gravitational layer in the case of Mars. Although some craters (mascons) still observable on almost uniform gravitational background.
If we go further along the evolutionary ladder, then on the gravitational map of the Earth, which in turn is twice the diameter of Mars, such significant variations in the acceleration of gravity are no longer observed. That is, on Earth all former mascons that occurred in their time, are absorbed by planet’s uniform gravitational layer. The gravitational map of the Earth is not given, because if it is presented in a resolution for the acceleration of gravity comparable to the above maps of the Moon and Mars, this map will be almost homogeneous (monochrome). The maximum difference in the acceleration of gravity at different points of the Earth’s surface is 0.005 m/sec2. For comparison, on Mars this difference is 0.06 m/sec2, which is 11 times more than on Earth, and this is for average Mars gravity, which is 2.6 times smaller than the Earth gravity.
All these arguments serve a single purpose – to show that there are evidences of the embryonic gravity in small celestial bodies and it is possible to detect evolutionary chain of changes in the planets, which is confirming our hypothesis.
There is a certain minimum size of celestial bodies, allowing them to have their own gravity. If the body is smaller than some critical size, then even in the event of a collision triggering the gravitational process, the gravity process will stall, since self-sustaining ether condensation requires a pressure difference between the reactor and the free ether (that is, isolation from the external ether, that isolation is most easily provided by a layer of substance).
If rotating celestial bodies do not possess gravity, they experience centrifugal forces as they rotate relative to the surrounding ether.
General considerations on the application of the Law of Mechanics to the Solar System Let’s consider the consequence of the Law of Mechanics:
“If the body is free, it is accelerated together with the ether without any inertia (or internal stresses). There is no stress inside the free body during any acceleration, change of direction, or sudden stop of the ether carrying the body.” In other words, free bodies move at the speed of the ether surrounding them, following to any of ether’s acceleration “without feeling” these accelerations.
From the point of view of the body — ether (space) are motionless, and no experiment within this body or near the body can detect motion caused by the surrounding ether.
The solar system as a whole and all its components are free to move in space. The ether in which the solar system is located moves under the influence of some “external” source of gravity (the absorber of the ether), and this aether carries all the bodies of the solar system in the same way. Solar gravity does not pull the planets with it, there is no need for that, as well as the planets do not need to pull their satellites with them in this “galactic” component of the solar system movement. The role of solar gravity is only in ensuring the orbital motion of all bodies of the solar system around the Sun.
Similarly, there is no need for Earth gravity to carry the Moon in its path around the sun. Solar gravity (the acceleration of the ether caused by the Sun) moves all bodies (located at the same distance from the Sun) with the same acceleration and speed around the Sun. In other words – solar gravity causes the same acceleration around the Sun for the Earth and the Moon (at this stage we do not take into account the difference in acceleration caused by the movement of the Earth-Moon system). The role of Earth’s gravity is only to ensure the orbital motion of the Moon and other satellites.
This sequence does not continue indefinitely. The Moon is the last object to have gravity, a weak, imperfect shape, but still Gravity.
The small bodies of the solar system do not produce gravity. Small bodies are only passive participants of gravitational interactions. They get attracted, but they cannot attract others. They do not have gravitational sources – ether transforming reactors.
It is necessary to repeat – bodies less than a certain critical size do not absorb aether.
Going back to the Earth: since the Earth is a free body, it repeats all the movements, and the acceleration of the ether in which it is located. The accelerations caused by the galactic and solar component of ether motion have a very small gradient throughout the Earth, making them almost undetectable; the Michelson – Morley experiment showed this very well.
But there are accelerations that are easier to detect – accelerations that have a significant gradient throughout the earth’s dimensions. Acceleration of the ether occurring on the Earth and caused the Earth, fall into this category. As we mentioned earlier, Earth gravity is the cause of the orbital motion of Earth’s satellites, and we will consider the application of the Law of Mechanics to this very important topic in a separate section.
Application of the Law of Mechanics to Rotational motion
First, it should be noted that there are two different types of rotational motion:
1) Rotation of the body, which is not caused by the rotation of the surrounding ether — this is the most common and familiar type of rotation. In this case, the ether does not rotate with the body, and the ether is not the main reason for the rotation of the body.
In this case, parts of the body have accelerations relative to the ether and therefore forces are applied to the body from the ether, this is the centrifugal force, which has the same nature as inertia. The accelerations are directed from the center of rotation of the body to its periphery, and since parts of the body cannot move freely with the ether, these parts of the body experience forces coinciding with the accelerations of the ether.
Here it is important to understand that for this type of rotational motion, accelerations exist even if the rotation occurs at a constant angular velocity, and these accelerations occur due to the difference in linear velocities and directions of motion of parts of the body relative to the ether.
The rotation of the body in the stationary surrounding ether will be discussed in more detail in the next Chapter.
2) The ether rotates the Rotating body. This situation is typical for the axial rotation of celestial bodies with gravity, such as the Earth or other planets and stars. In this case, the ether rotates synchronously with the body, the body is free of its movement, and there are no relative accelerations between the parts of the body and the ether. With changes in the speed of rotation of the ether, the body follows them without inertia, that is, without internal stress and centrifugal force. Of course, this is an idealized situation describing in principle the behavior of the body in the rotating ether from the point of view of the Law of Mechanics. This situation is only approximately fulfilled in the real world.
In practice, planets and stars do not move completely freely in their axial rotation, since the rotation of the ether does not perfectly coincide with the rotation of all parts of the rotating body. Some effects of such imperfectness will be discussed in the section devoted to tides. But conditions for synchronous rotation with ether can exist on the surface of the celestial body, or close to its surface.
Let’s take a closer look at this second type of rotational motion. The main factor determining the direction of rotation of all planets is the direction of rotation of the Sun. Solar gravity causes a spiral motion (vortex) of the ether, the direction of which will coincide with the direction of rotation of the subsequent etheric vortices of the planets. We will consider in more detail the mechanism providing such coincidences later, but for now will only note that this simple mechanism only approximately determines the initial direction of rotation and orientation of the axes of rotation of the planets.
The self-rotation of the planet increases with the growth of the planet and the strengthening of the planet’s gravity. The axis of rotation of the planet over time can change its orientation due to any external factors; especially at the boundaries of the solar system, where the influence of the Sun is weaker and, at the same time, external influences are relatively stronger.
The planets’ own gravity has a rotational component. Since the planet rotates, its gravitational layer (the layer in which the ether turns into substance) also rotates. The rotation of this ether absorber will cause the rotation of the ether flow, which is forced to follow the “moving target”.
It is easy to see that the rotation of the spherical surface absorbing the ether with uniform intensity creates a differential rotation of the ether at different latitudes. In General, the flow of air will create a figure of the rotational shape coaxial with the axis of rotation of the planet.
The polar regions of the planet will absorb ether from a relatively larger (per unit of the surface of the sphere) volume of the surrounding space compared to areas at low latitudes, and especially at the equator.
Thus, at the equator of a rotating planet or star, the ether has a maximum speed. The linear velocity of the equator is much higher than the linear velocity of the poles, so if we assume the equality of the absorption capacity for any point of the sphere, then the unit surface of the rotating sphere near the equator accounts for a smaller amount of available ambient ether. Therefore, to ensure the absorption of ether equal to the poles, the higher ether’s speed in the area of the equator is required.
Once started, it will accelerate the rotation on itself due to the positive feedback mechanism. Until it reaches the speed limit.
The speed of rotation is limited by the effect of differential rotation, as the polar regions of the planet slow down rotation. The stars and planets have a solid nucleus, through which two differently rotating regions are connected together: fast and slow. The resulting rotation is set somewhere in the middle, forming a distorted shape of the planet (flattened), due to the interaction of two forces.
The Mechanism Of Rotation Of The Sun, Tachocline
Let’s see how we can apply this model to analyze the rotation of matter inside the Sun, based on the data of helioseismology obtained by the National Solar Observatory NSF (NSF’S National Solar Observatory). The description of the graph says:
“Time-averaged rotation rates, plotted as a function of radius at different latitudes within the Sun. The tachocline — a region where the rotation rate changes from differential rotation in the convection zone to nearly solid-body rotation in the interior, is evident near the base of the convection zone, determined to be at radius 0.71 R (where R is the overall solar radius).” (Image courtesy NSF’S National Solar Observatory)
Our comments on the chart are shown in blue.
The Sun has two functionally different zones depending on the latitude: above and below about 40 degrees.
— Accelerating zone (from the equator to 40) — leading forward, in this zone the angular velocities are higher than the angular velocities of the nucleus-this zone provides the acceleration of the entire system.
— Braking zone (from 40 to pole) — pulling back, in this zone the angular velocities are lower than the angular velocities of the nucleus, this zone provides deceleration, braking, and as a result stabilization of the entire system.
Along with this, there are four functionally different layers in the depth of the Sun:
The upper layer – in which the ether continues to accelerate on its way to the underlying layer.
— In this layer we see only an increase in the angular velocity in all cases. This increase in angular velocity is caused by the ether, which is still accelerating, catching up with the next faster rotating – absorbing layer.
— We see that the acceleration of matter in this layer exists at all latitudes (deceleration in this layer is not observed at any latitude)
— The level of acceleration depends on the latitude – the closer to the equator, the greater the angular acceleration.
— The values of angular velocities on the surface of the Sun – the points of intersection of the graphs with the right coordinate axis (r/R=1.00) have values very close to the actual angular velocity of the ether entering the Sun, because the liquid upper layer is almost free in its rotational motion.
The transformation layer is the real engine of the whole system (as well as the Solar System in General).
Since this layer is liquid, it is also quite free in its rotation.
We see that the angular velocity has a maximum at the beginning of this layer for all latitudes. This maximum means the beginning of the process of converting the ether into a substance. As the ether turns into a substance, the density of the ether gradually decreases, and the ether needs to penetrate deeper into the layers of matter with higher pressure to turn into a substance. This is a self-regulating process – at a certain depth, a balance is established, and the density of the ether decreases to a level at which the ether ceases to turn into a substance at a given pressure of the surrounding substance.
This boundary of the minimum ether density is represented by an additional sublayer, which we do not distinguish as a separate layer because it has different sizes at different latitudes; and because this sublayer does not have sharply distinctive functionality. This sublayer is represented by horizontal sections connecting the transform and intermediate layers, and is most representative at the equator. At this depth, all the ether that could be converted into matter has already been expended, and the pressure of the ether has stabilized at some level that is less than the pressure required to compress into substance, and is equal to the entire space inside the Sun below the transforming layer. This space includes the nucleus and the intermediate molten layer; in this space there is no gravity, since there is no acceleration of the ether.
The intermediate molten layer, or the so-called tachocline – it connects the liquid upper layers with the solid core. It works as a liquid friction “clutch” in the acceleration zone, and as a friction brake in the stopping zone. We see that with increasing depth, the angular velocity in the accelerating zone decreases in this layer, and the angular velocity in the braking zone increases. Two main sources of energy contribute to the melting of the material of this layer – the heat coming from the upper layers, and the heat generated inside the tachocline itself due to the mutual friction between the core and the braking and accelerating zones.
A solid core is the foundation of the entire system. The core works as a support, providing a base for all the upper layers and thus conditions for accelerating (actually braking) the ether flowing from all sides through the solar matter. We see that the angular velocity in this layer is approximately constant, as it should be for a solid.
Another observation is that the size of the layers depends on the latitude, this can be explained as a result of the dependence of the critical acceleration of the ether on the latitude, and the equatorial swelling (here we are talking about the linear acceleration of the ether in the direction of the center of the Sun, not the rotational acceleration). In general, this dependence is very simple: the critical pressure and acceleration of the ether are achieved earlier at the equator and the inflow of ether is consumed faster than at high latitudes.
As we can see, the rotation of the Sun is provided by a balanced mechanism that uses both positive feedback and stabilizing braking. The presence of such a mechanism allows us to explain the reasons for periodic changes in the speed of rotation of the Sun and various vortex structures with periods of oscillation from 5 minutes to 22 years. Such periodic oscillations can be harmonics and subharmonics resulting from the operation of feedbacks in the mechanism of rotation of the sun in response to any changes in external conditions.
*
The mechanism we have described also creates structures that extend far beyond the surface of stars and planets — such majestic structures as the solar system and Saturn’s rings.
To understand how differential rotation works outside the gravitational body, we can analyze the behavior of the ether in the upper layer of the Sun. The upper layer closely reflects the movement of the ether, since this layer is free in its rotational motion, and can be subject to rotational accelerations of the ether, because the substance in this layer is liquid.
From our analysis of the upper layer, we concluded that the equator has an increased angular acceleration. This effect creates an equatorial bulge on the surface of the Sun; and this structure continues beyond the Sun. The acceleration gradient gradually decreases with distance from the Sun.
This difference of accelerations creates a constant “thrust” (“draft”) in the direction of the Equatorial plane of the Sun, and similarly, to the Equatorial planes of the planets. This effect is most obvious for gas giants, each of which has a system of rings, of which the most representative belongs to Saturn.
Saturn’s Rings! – what other evidence is needed for the fact that universal gravity, as an internal universal property inherent in matter — is a fiction?
Here it makes sense to once again compare the Law of Mechanics with Newton’s hypothesis of universal gravitation. The law of Mechanics not only rejects the hypothesis of the inherent property of matter to attract another substance, the Law of Mechanics rejects the idea that gravity always acts on the shortest line between bodies. The law of Mechanics considers gravity as a stream of ether having a vortex nature of motion. At a distance from the planets, this translates into the orbital motion of satellites, especially in the equatorial plane. And at close distances from the planets, the gravitational vortex of the ether has a synchronous rotation with the planet and a significant radial component, which gives the impression of a steep fall of bodies for the observer rotating along with the surface. We will consider in more detail the features of the motion of the gravitational vortex depending on the distance from the planets and stars in the section devoted to the age of celestial bodies and the evolution of stars.
And ending with this Chapter, one more remark. The mechanism of the solar system proposed by the Law of Mechanics returns us to the similarity of the mechanism of rotation of the planets by Ptolemy. The idea of the motion of the celestial spheres to which the planets are attached has existed since ancient times, was then rejected, and is now proposed again, in a modified form.