Newton’s first law
Let us compare Newton’s First Law with the Law of Mechanics, more precisely with the second part of the Law of Mechanics, which describes the behaviour of bodies moving at constant speeds.

Formulation of Newton’s First law:

Every body continues to be held in a state of rest or uniform and rectilinear motion, as long as and since it is not forced to change this state by the applied forces.

In other words, if the body is not affected by an external force, the body is at rest or uniform rectilinear motion.

From the point of view of the Law of mechanics, Newton’s First law is true only for the state of rest.

Formulation Of The Law Of Mechanics:

The body is at rest relative to the ether does not experience any effects. The body, moving in the ether rectilinearly and at a constant speed, experiences a retarding effect from the ether, but this effect is extremely small at low speeds.

The first statement is quite obvious, it is a tautology: if the body is left alone, it will be at rest – the law of conservation in its simplest form.

The second statement requires more detailed consideration. Newton, following Galileo, believed that the body in the empty space able to move forever with constant velocity. The validity of this statement cannot be confirmed, even if we assume that there are no facts contradicting it. Like any hypothesis stating the ideality of a property or phenomenon, it is fundamentally unprovable.

This misconception was accepted in the transition from the geocentric to the heliocentric model. People fascinated by the idea of turning the Earth around the Sun and overthrowing Ptolemy, throw the baby out with the bathwater. They did not notice that the Earth does not move in the void, and it is impossible to move perpetually without an external source. Two ideas of Aristotle were discarded at the same time, thus leading science to a deadlock for 400 years.

Until now, organized science considers the movement of celestial bodies in the solar system as the fact confirming the eternal movement of bodies in the void. In fact, the situation is quite the opposite: the movement of celestial bodies contradicts the hypothesis of movement without resistance and confirms the hypothesis of the inhibition and entrainment of bodies by rotating ether.

Based on such facts as well as on the Law of Mechanics for Accelerations, the provision was derived: that the ether (space) always interacts with bodies that move in it. In other words, the ether has a mechanical inhibitory effect on the bodies that move in it at a constant speed; the degree of this action is determined by the speed of the body, the higher the speed, the stronger the resistance of the ether.

Therefore:

The law of Mechanics for Velocities declares a very weak (at low speeds negligible) resistance of the ether to bodies moving in it at a constant speed.

The law of Mechanics for Accelerations indicates a significant (even at low speeds) resistance of the ether to accelerations of bodies.

The law of Mechanics for Accelerations states that the ether has a mechanical effect on the body, during acceleration of the ether relative to the body. The mechanism of action of the accelerating ether on the body is easiest to imagine, if we assume that ether has the viscosity.

Non-zero viscosity characterizes ether as a real physical object, and not as some kind of idealization.

The basic idea of the Law of Mechanics can be reduced to the statement that the ether has a very low viscosity for bodies moving uniformly, and much higher viscosity for bodies moving with accelerations. This is perfectly natural behavior for a real gaseous medium.

We will not theorize now about the reasons for this behavior, it may be, for example, the transition from the laminar flow of ether through the pores of matter (at a constant speed) to turbulent (at accelerations); or maybe a simpler mechanism…

Recognition of resistance to uniform motion of bodies has far-reaching consequences. The picture of the universe immediately resolutely simplified and clarified.

The presence of viscosity in the ether leads to the conclusion that the mass can be represented as a coefficient of resistance to the leakage of ether through the body.

If we develop this concept further, it turns out that the Law of Mechanics leads to conclusions similar to relativistic, stating that the resistance to the movement of bodies increases with increasing speed, that is, the increase in the mass of bodies with increasing speed.

But the similarity disappears as soon as we move to the concept of the maximum possible speed. According to the Law of Mechanics, the speed of the body reaches the maximum limit when reaching a balance between the accelerating force and the force of resistance of the ether. The maximum speed limit should depend on the accelerating force and be different for bodies of different composition and size, and is not related to the speed of light. That is, the larger and more massive the atoms of matter, the lower the maximum possible speed at a given accelerating force.

This effect, in contrast to the relativistic, has an important consequence: the speed of any free body relative to the ether should gradually fall to zero due to the resistance of the ether. This process is inversely exponential and very lengthy. The results of this deceleration can be seen in the solar system, where all the planets have a very close to zero speed relative to the surrounding ether and are located approximately in the same plane.

The discussion of the nature and nature of the mass will be continued in the section devoted to space and time. Let’s repeat for now:

The property of an inertial mass in real bodies is a consequence of a sharp increase in the resistance of the ether with changes in the velocity of bodies. This behavior is characteristic of the movement of bodies in ordinary gases.

The difference in the frontal resistance of the body at a constant speed and acceleration depends on the magnitude of the acceleration, and the degree of permeability of the body by ether (i.e., the structure of the body). Bodies consisting of more condensed ether, have less voids, that is, have greater resistance, and hence greater mass.

This approach to the movement of bodies in a vacuum eliminates the fundamental difference between movement in a vacuum and the movement of bodies in gases and liquids, existing in the official doctrine. According to the Law of Mechanics, the motion of a body under any conditions (in vacuum, gas or liquid) is subject to qualitatively (fundamentally) similar laws and differs mainly in numerical coefficients of resistance to motion.

More about the differences
Newton’s first law does not explain “relative to what” the body is resting or moving about. The generally accepted understanding of this law presupposes a second body as a frame of reference.

In the Law of Mechanics the reference system is Ether.

Newton’s first law does not clearly explain where the force exerted on the body comes from. The common understanding of this law assumes that the second body is a source of force, especially taking into account Newton’s Third law.

Also, Newton’s first law says nothing about the nature (mechanism) of force as an objective category.

In the Law of Mechanics, the source of the force acting on the body is the Ether.

And the mechanism of force is the transfer of motion from the ether to the body when the ether accelerates relative to the body.

Later, in the sections devoted to electromagnetic phenomena, we will consider the processes in which bodies cause the acceleration of the ether.

Newton’s second law
Newton: the Force acting on the body is equal to the product of the mass of the body by the acceleration created by this force, and the directions of the force and acceleration coincide.

Interpretation Of The Law Of Mechanics

The second consequence of the Law of Mechanics:

inertia is the force that a body experiences when its speed changes under the influence of another body.

law of mechanics:

ether has a mechanical effect on the body, in the presence of acceleration of the ether relative to the body.

Newton doesn’t explain what mass is. The interpretation of mass as a quantity of matter is generally accepted.

The law of Mechanics does not mention mass, because mass does not matter in a situation where a single body interacts with the ether, since all bodies, regardless of mass, are accelerated by the ether equally.

Mass, as physical category arises only if in interaction with the body enters the second body. In this sense, mass is a relative category that requires a second body as a support. This relativeness of the nature of mass makes it similar to other physical categories, such as distance and speed.

In the previous section we have considered in detail the understanding of the nature of mass on the basis of the Law of Mechanics. Here, just mention that the recognition of ether as a primary physical object, logically leads to an understanding of the essence of mass, as the amount of ether condensed into a substance. Ether, as the foundation (building material) of the material world, unites all kinds of matter through the physical category “mass”. Bodies of different composition are united by a common property – mass, i.e. mass reveals the unity of the structure of the material world.

Later, in the section devoted to Time, we also consider the category of acceleration, from the point of view of the Law of Mechanics.

Newton’s third law.
Newton: Force of action is equal and opposite to reaction:

Interpretation of the Law of Mechanics: Newton’s Third law is not a comprehensive law, but rather a rule relating to a narrow type of interactions. The situation when the force of action is equal to the force of counteraction is limited to a particular case of interaction of two bodies in a straight line and is observed only at the point of interaction.

A force may be applied to the body that does not coincide in direction with the velocity of the ether relative to the body. Since the force acting on the body depends mainly on the acceleration of the ether relative to the body, in cases where the directions of acceleration and the speed of the ether do not coincide, the direction of the resulting force is determined by the acceleration of the ether, and not its speed.

The force can be applied to the body in a manner that it does not coincide in the direction of the speed of the ether relative to the body. Since the force acting on the body depends mainly on the acceleration of the ether relative to the body, in cases where the directions of acceleration and the speed of the ether do not coincide, the direction of the resulting force is determined by the acceleration of the ether, and not its speed.

The extreme manifestation of such a situation is the cases when the force acting on the body is directed opposite to the speed of the ether relative to the body.

We will return to the consideration of such situations, when we analyze such seemingly heterogeneous phenomena as tides, star aberration and magnetism.

Newton’s third law States that two equal opposing forces act strictly in a straight line and are directed towards each other.

The Law of Mechanics does not limit the direction of the reaction by the line of application of the acting force. This becomes possible due to the fact that there is no direct interaction between the bodies, but interaction through an intermediate object (ether), and this object can deflect the direction of interaction. As examples of interactions not “along straight lines”, we can mention the reaction of gyroscopes to the application of radial force, and the Ampere force. Such cases will be discussed in more detail in the relevant sections.

Newton’s Third Law states that the second body is the source of the force applied to the first body, and vice versa.

The Law of Mechanics does not agree with this, and states that the ether is the direct source of the force acting on the body. The second body does not act directly on the first body, but modifies the conditions of action of the ether, which is the true active object. This is a very important point that requires clarification.

The bodies interact with each other, as they are impenetrable to each other. The interaction of bodies is their contact, this can be likened to a change in the shape of bodies, accompanied by a change in mass.

A great contribution to the disguise of the true state of affairs is made by gravity, under the conditions of which all practical activity of people takes place. Gravity creates a curved space in which all bodies are constantly pressed to the Earth, and are deprived of the opportunity to freely follow the movements of the ether surrounding them. The conditions on Earth surface distort the interaction of bodies; and the lack of understanding of these distortions led to the erroneous thesis of equality of action and reaction. Only the back pressure force exerted by the second (active) body and the inertia force applied by the ether accelerated through the first (subjected to act) body can be equal to each other. The second possible case of equality of forces of action and reaction is when the body is an intermediate link between other interacting bodies.

(An explanatory illustration is planned here.)

Thus, the interaction between the bodies, and the forces that arise from interaction, are determined by the masses of the bodies (with equal velocities). On Earth, any mechanical actions of any bodies ultimately end with the support on the Earth. Even an airplane flying in the sky always rests on the Earth at the end of a long chain of interactions through atmospheric molecules.

The mass of the planet Earth is many times greater than the masses of all bodies located on it, and this completely masks the real state of affairs. The forces applied to bodies of small mass can reach large quantities, although in fact, these bodies simply rest on the Earth, being links of the transmission of force from the mass of the Earth to the mass of the body located at the end of the interaction chain.

Another situation is the interaction of two bodies with different speeds (accelerations), here a body with a smaller mass, but with greater speed, can exert a greater force on the second body.

Here we temporarily set a pause. For the first acquaintance with the Law of Mechanics, this is enough. To be continued when and if the opportunity will arise. In the meantime, we will switch to the topic of gravity and the inner mechanics of the planets.

The formulation of the Law of Mechanics consists of two parts:

1) The Ether which is accelerating relative to the bodies, has a mechanical effect on the bodies proportional to the magnitude of this acceleration.

The validity of this statement is confirmed by our daily experience.

When the speed changes, we are always affected by the force in the direction opposite to our acceleration.

We call this phenomenon inertia, without thinking about its origin and mechanism, “we were taught…”

Indeed, the inertia of thinking prevents us from seeing the obvious: the force of inertia is applied and acts from the space, and it occurs when acceleration of space through the body occurs.

2) The ether has a braking effect on the body moving in it, the braking force is proportional to the speed of movement.

Analysis of the motion of the planets in the solar system, leads to the assertion that they all move under the influence of space, making a rotational motion around the Sun. The mechanism of formation of this vortex is considered in the section of this work devoted to gravity.

In short: the gravitational vortex consists of two symmetrical vortices converging in the plane of the solar equator. Any material body that is close enough to the sun or another planet is captured by these vortices and moves in closed orbits gradually shifting to the plane of the equator. Saturn’s rings show the result of this mechanism with all the clarity.

Any material body gradually slows down in space and, after sufficient time stops, and will be at rest relative to space. The planets of the solar system are almost at complete rest relative to the space that surrounds them. This movement of space with planets resting in it we observe in space.

Today’s situation is comparable to that of the middle ages, when the claims of the Earth’s orbit around the Sun seemed to be utter nonsense to all sane people who saw perfectly well that the Sun revolves around the Earth.

Curiously, but Ptolemy was close to the truth when he claimed that the celestial spheres moved the luminaries. Here it is, the irony of the spiral of knowledge.

I do not think that there is a need to illustrate the mechanism of inertia, it seems that it is so obvious, and that such illustrations can sometimes only confuse, if one can imagine, that the stationary ether (the space) is accelerating through you and tries to pull you out from the seat of the car during sudden braking.

Consequences arising from the Law of Mechanics:

First consequence: the body at rest relative to the ether does not experience any effects.

The first consequence partly coincides with Newton’s first law.

But, the first consequence is not applicable to bodies moving relative to ether. This is the difference between the Law of Mechanics and Newton’s first law, which does not distinguish between resting and uniformly and rectilinearly moving bodies.

A small comment on the Law of Mechanics, for better understanding.

The law of Mechanics can be reduced to the statement that the ether (space) has viscosity.

The law itself can be divided into two parts: the first relates to accelerations, and the second to velocities.

The first part of the Law of Mechanics, which can be called the Law of Acceleration, says that the viscosity of the ether increases sharply with changes in velocities relative to the ether, this viscosity is proportional to the magnitude of the change in the velocity of bodies relative to the ether. This viscosity can be called the dynamic viscosity of the ether. (The term dynamic viscosity is already used in relation to a completely different phenomenon, but we have no choice, and despite this fact, it is still used here because of the good correspondence to our subject.)

The second part of the Law of Mechanics, which can be called the Law of Velocities, declares that the viscosity of the ether is vanishingly small at low speeds and increases with the growth of the speed of the body relative to the ether. This viscosity can be called the kinematic viscosity of the ether.

Kinematic viscosity is extremely low at the speeds with which we usually deal (viscosity of the order of 10 to minus the fortieth degree per unit body weight). The action of the Law of Velocities begins to manifest itself noticeably on cosmic scales, long time periods and high speeds. Therefore, we will talk about the kinematic viscosity of the ether in the sections devoted to cosmology, optics and electricity.

But when considering most mechanical phenomena, we will assume Zero interaction between the ether and a body moving uniformly in it.

Second consequence of the Law of Mechanics is also superficially similar to Newton’s second law: inertia is the force that a body experiences when its speed changes under the influence of another body.

The second consequence is quite obvious: the force applied by ether to the body is always opposite in the direction of acceleration of the body.

Force applied to the body, coincides with the direction of the ether flow and is equal to the product of the acceleration of the ether relative to the body by weight. Thus, we have: F = ma

But, the law of Mechanics states that in the interaction of bodies, the real force is the force of inertia, and it is directed opposite to the force described by Newton.

Thus, Inertia is the acceleration of the ether through the body. Whenever there is a change in the flow of ether through the body , a force of inertia is applied to the body.

The main difference from Newton’s law is the source of force – in our interpretation the source of force is the Ether, with respect to which the body is accelerated. The role of the second body is only auxiliary, the second body is not a source of force, but only becomes the object of the force of inertia as a result of contact with the first body accelerated relative to the ether.

Hence, one would think, naturally follows Newton’s third law: the force of action is equal to the force of counteraction, since both bodies experience the force from the ether as a result of mutual accelerations.

But, according to the Law of Mechanics, the situation F = –F , when two equal forces are directed in opposite directions, and act strictly in a straight line is only a special case, not always observed in the interactions of bodies. More on this, in the section devoted to the comparison of Newton’s Laws and the Law of Mechanics.

Gravity is caused by the acceleration of the ether relative to the body. This is also the mechanism of the force of inertia.

The Earth being a support for the bodies on it, prevents the movement of these bodies along with the accelerating ether.

At the same time, the planet Earth creates conditions for the acceleration of the ether, constantly absorbing the ether from the surrounding space. The ether stream accelerates on its way to the inner layers of the Earth. (In more detail, the process of accelerating the ether by planets, stars and within the solar system is discussed in the section devoted to the Mechanics of the Solar System)

So the body can not follow the ether flow accelerating through it, since the earth’s surface prevents the further fall of the body. The accelerating flow of ether exerts force on the body, this force is the weight of the body. Thus, the force of gravity is identical in origin to the force of inertia.

It is necessary to highlight a very important consequence of the Law of Mechanics for bodies that can move freely with the flow of ether. Which is the absence of inertia, or in other words – the absence of external forces, weightlessness.

If the body is free in its movement, it is accelerated along with the ether without any inertia (or internal stresses and overloads). There is no stress inside the free body during any acceleration, change of direction of motion or sudden stop of the ether carrying the body.

By other words: free bodies (for example, such as our Earth) “do not feel” any movement or acceleration of the Ether surrounding them.